Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 44-712 (2026)

Labor dispute defined. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Labor dispute defined. 

The term "labor dispute" means any controversy between an employer and the majority of his employees in a collective bargaining unit concerning the right or process or details of collective bargaining or the designation of representatives.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1951–1973 · leading case: Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union Local No. 328, 232 P.2d 968 (Idaho 1951).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union Local No. 328, 232 P.2d 968 (Idaho 1951). · cites it 4× “The complaint stated a cause of action under and in compliance with Section 44-712, I.C., alleging none of respondent Poffenroth’s employees are members of appellant Union and that appellant Union has not been authorized by any of said employees to represent them; thus no labor…”
Cox's Food Ctr., Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local No. 1653, 420 P.2d 645 (Idaho 1966). · cites it 2× “Appellant contends that the district court improperly refused to assert jurisdiction over the alleged labor dispute herein involved; specifically it contends that in refusing jurisdiction and in dismissing the action the court committed error in holding (1) that the picketing…”
Tarr v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street Elec. Ry. & Motor Coach Employees, 250 P.2d 904 (Idaho 1952). · cites it 4× “The dispute between the Pocatello Transit Company and appellants was a labor dispute within the meaning of Section 44-712, I.C. Boise Street Car Co.”
Simpkins v. Sw. Idaho Painters Dist. Council No. 57, 505 P.2d 313 (Idaho 1973). · cites it 4× “The role played by I.C. § 44-712 in appellants’ attack against the union picketing is rather obscure.”
Twin Falls Constr. Co. v. Operating Engineers Local 370, 509 P.2d 788 (Idaho 1973). · cites it 2× “§ 44-703(e) 1 to incorporate the definition of labor dispute contained in I.C. § 44-712 2 ), rev’d mem., 352 U.S. 884 , 77 S.”
Simpkins v. Sw Idaho Paint. Dist. C. No. 57, 505 P.2d 313 (Idaho 1973). · cites it 6× “Specifically, we are required to decide whether the Idaho Antitrust Law, [32] and I.C. § 44-712 [33] — which narrowly defines the labor disputes that underlie the right to engage in peaceful picketing, constitute valid bases for assertion of state jurisdiction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.