Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 44-801 (2026)
Secondary boycott.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Secondary boycott.
It shall be unlawful to cause or threaten to cause, and/or combine or conspire to cause or threaten to cause, injury to one not a party to the particular labor dispute, to aid which such boycott is initiated or continued, whether by (a) withholding patronage, labor, or other beneficial business intercourse; (b) picketing; (c) refusing to handle, install, use or work on particular materials, equipment or supplies; or (d) by any other means, in order to bring him against his will into a concerted plan to coerce or inflict damage upon another or to compel the party with whom such labor dispute exists to comply with any particular demands.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1941–1973 · leading case: Union Cent. Life Inurance v. Nielson, 114 P.2d 252 (Idaho 1941).
Union Cent. Life Inurance v. Nielson, 114 P.2d 252 (Idaho 1941). “Section 44-801, I. C. A., provides: “Mortgage is a contract by which specific property is hypothecated for the performance of an act without the necessity of a change of possession.”
Simpkins v. Sw. Idaho Painters Dist. Council No. 57, 505 P.2d 313 (Idaho 1973). “The findings with respect to § 8(b)(4) should also put to rest allegations made under the Idaho Secondary Boycott Act, I.C. § 44-801 et seq., to the extent that it remains applicable to this case in light of Pocatello Bldg.”
Simpkins v. Sw Idaho Paint. Dist. C. No. 57, 505 P.2d 313 (Idaho 1973). “[31] The findings with respect to § 8(b) (4) should also put to rest allegations made under the Idaho Secondary Boycott Act, I.C. § 44-801 et seq., to the extent that it remains applicable to this case in light of Pocatello Bldg.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.