Idaho Code § 48-902

Manufacturer’s duty to repair — Service and repair facilities. 

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Manufacturer’s duty to repair — Service and repair facilities. 

(1) If a new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties, and the consumer reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer during the term of the applicable express warranties or during the period of two (2) years following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, or during the period ending with the date on which the mileage on the motor vehicle reaches twenty-four thousand (24,000) miles, whichever is the earliest date, the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer shall make the repairs necessary to conform the vehicle to the applicable express warranties, notwithstanding the fact that the repairs are made after the expiration of the warranty term or the two (2) year period.

(2)  Every manufacturer of motor vehicles sold and for which the manufacturer has made an express warranty shall maintain sufficient service and repair facilities reasonably close to all areas in which its motor vehicles are sold to carry out the terms of the warranties or designate and authorize as service and repair facilities independent repair or service facilities reasonably close to all areas in which its motor vehicles are sold to carry out the terms of the warranties. As a means of complying with the provisions of this subsection, a manufacturer may, in a town or city where there is not a franchise market representative, enter into warranty service contracts with independent service and repair facilities.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1996–1996 · leading case: Griffith v. Latham Motors, Inc.
Griffith v. Latham Motors, Inc. (1996) idaho · cites it 2× “I.C. § 48-902(2) (Supp.1995) and I.C. § 28-2-313 (1995).”
— Idaho Code § 48-902(2) — 1 case
Griffith v. Latham Motors, Inc. (1996) idaho “I.C. § 48-902(2) (Supp.1995) and I.C. § 28-2-313 (1995).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.