Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 56-218 (2026)
Recovery of certain medical assistance.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Recovery of certain medical assistance.
(1) Except where exempted or waived in accordance with federal law medical assistance pursuant to this chapter paid on behalf of an individual who was fifty-five (55) years of age or older when the individual received such assistance may be recovered from the individual’s estate, and the estate of the spouse, if any, for such aid paid to either or both:
(a) There shall be no adjustment or recovery until after the death of both the individual and the spouse, if any, and only at a time when the individual has no surviving child who is under twenty-one (21) years of age or is blind or permanently and totally disabled as defined in 42 U.S.C. 1382c.
(b) While one (1) spouse survives, except where joint probate will be authorized pursuant to section 15-3-111, Idaho Code, a claim for recovery under this section may be established in the estate of the deceased spouse.
(c) The claim against the estate of the first deceased spouse must be made within the time provided by section 15-3-801(b), Idaho Code, if the estate is administered and actual notice is given to the director as required by subsection (5) of this section. However, if there is no administration of the estate of the first deceased spouse, or if no actual notice is given to the director as required by subsection (5) of this section, no claim shall be required until the time provided for creditor claims in the estate of the survivor.
(d) Nothing in this section authorizes the recovery of the amount of any aid from the estate or surviving spouse of a recipient to the extent that the need for aid resulted from a crime committed against the recipient.
(2) Transfers of real or personal property, on or after the look-back dates defined in 42 U.S.C. 1396p, by recipients of such aid, or their spouses, without adequate consideration are voidable and may be set aside by an action in the district court.
(3) Except where there is a surviving spouse, or a surviving child who is under twenty-one (21) years of age or is blind or permanently and totally disabled as defined in 42 U.S.C. 1382c, the amount of any medical assistance paid under this chapter on behalf of an individual who was fifty-five (55) years of age or older when the individual received such assistance is a claim against the estate in any guardianship or conservatorship proceedings and may be paid from the estate.
(4) For purposes of this section, the term "estate" shall include:
(a) All real and personal property and other assets included within the individual’s estate, as defined for purposes of state probate law; and
(b) Any other real and personal property and other assets in which the individual had any legal title or interest at the time of death, to the extent of such interest, including such assets conveyed to a survivor, heir, or assign of the deceased individual through joint tenancy, tenancy in common, survivorship, life estate, living trust or other arrangement.
(5) Claims made pursuant to this section shall be classified and paid as a debt with preference as defined in section 15-3-805(5), Idaho Code. Any distribution or transfer of the estate prior to satisfying such claim is voidable and may be set aside by an action in the district court. The personal representative of every estate subject to a claim under this section must, within thirty (30) days of the appointment, give notice in writing to the director of his or her appointment to administer the estate.
(6) The department may file a notice of lien against the property of any estate subject to a claim under this section.
(a) In order to perfect a lien against real or personal property, the department shall, within ninety (90) days after the personal representative or successor makes a written request for prompt action to the director, or three (3) years from the death of the decedent, whichever is sooner, file a notice of lien in the same general form and manner as provided in section 56-218A(3)(a), Idaho Code, in the office of the secretary of state, pursuant to section 45-1904, Idaho Code. Failure to file a notice of lien does not affect the validity of claims made pursuant to this section.
(b) The department may release the lien in whole or in part to permit the estate property to be administered by a court-appointed personal representative.
(c) The department may foreclose its lien, without probate, in any of the following circumstances:
(i) Where no personal representative has been appointed after one (1) year from the date of death of the survivor of both the individual and spouse, if any;
(ii) Where the property has been abandoned by the decedent’s heirs or successors, if any;
(iii) Where the real property taxes that are due and payable have remained unpaid for two (2) years and, after demand by the department, the heirs or successors, if any, have failed to seek appointment or pay the property taxes; or
(iv) Where all parties interested in the estate consent to foreclosure of the lien.
(7) The director shall promulgate rules reasonably necessary to implement this section including, but not limited to, rules establishing undue hardship waivers for the following circumstances:
(a) The estate subject to recovery is income-producing property that provides the primary source of support for other family members; or
(b) The estate has a value below an amount specified in the rules; or
(c) Recovery by the department will cause the heirs of the deceased individual to be eligible for public assistance.
(8) The cause of action to void a transfer without adequate consideration established in this section shall not be deemed to have accrued until the department discovers, or reasonably could have discovered, the facts constituting the transfer without adequate consideration.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1998–2024 · leading case: H&W v. Cathie Peterson RE: The Est. of Melvin Peterson (deceased), 340 P.3d 1143 (Idaho 2014).
H&W v. Cathie Peterson RE: The Est. of Melvin Peterson (deceased), 340 P.3d 1143 (Idaho 2014). “I.C. § 56-218(4](b). In its argument that Melvin Peterson’s retained life estate constitutes a part of his estate under this statute, IDHW relies on the language, “including such assets conveyed to a survivor, heir, or assign of the deceased individual through .”
State v. Est. of Elliott, 108 P.3d 324 (Idaho 2005). “The State of Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (Department) maintains that it is entitled to establish a claim against the estate of Dolores Arlene Elliott (Elliott) pursuant to Idaho Code § 56-218 (2002). The district court affirmed a decision by the magistrate court that…”
Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. McCormick, 283 P.3d 785 (Idaho 2012). “Idaho Code § 56-218 provides, in relevant part: (1) Except where exempted or waived in accordance with federal law medical assistance pursuant to this chapter paid on behalf of an individual who was fifty-five (55) years of age or older when the individual received such…”
H&W v. The Est. of Wiggins, 306 P.3d 201 (Idaho 2013). “Idaho Code § 56-218 (1) provides for the recovery of certain assistance provided by Medicaid: Except where exempted or waived in accordance with federal law medical assistance pursuant to this chapter paid on behalf of an individual who was fifty-five (55) years of age or older…”
State v. Est. of Kaminsky, 111 P.3d 121 (Idaho 2005). “The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (Department) filed a petition to “establish” a claim in the Estate of Joe Kaminsky (Estate) for recovery of Medicaid benefits, pursuant to I.C. § 56-218. The magistrate judge denied the Department’s petition for untimeliness.”
Ada Cnty. v. Browning, 489 P.3d 443 (Idaho 2021). “The district court found the County had a right to foreclose on the Lemhi Property on September 3, 2007, because Gloria died on September 3, 2006, and her estate had not been probated, subjecting the County to the conditions of either Idaho Code section 56-218(6)(c)(i) or…”
Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Jackman, 970 P.2d 6 (Idaho 1998). “I.C. § 56-218 AUTHORIZED RECOVERY OF THE BALANCE OF THE MEDICAID PAYMENTS FROM LIONEL’S ESTATE.”
Dept. of Health & Welfare v. Jackman, 970 P.2d 6 (Idaho 1998). “I.C. § 56-218 AUTHORIZED RECOVERY OF THE BALANCE OF THE MEDICAID PAYMENTS FROM LIONEL'S ESTATE.”
Est. of Darby v. Stinson, 68 So. 3d 702 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011). “) [9] Idaho ( Idaho Code Ann. § 56-218 .); Kansas (Kan.”
IDHW v. Beason (Idaho 2024). “See generally I.C. § 56-218. Idaho law also allows the Department 2 to set aside transfers of real property by Medicaid recipients if the transfers are not supported by adequate consideration.”
In re: Praveen Kevin Khurana (9th Cir. BAP 2019). “See Idaho Code Ann. § 56-218 (2). 3 The state court later entered an amended Transfer Judgment, to include the avoidance of a Quitclaim Deed to Adamson's son dated July 17, 2007.”
DHW v. Khurana (Idaho Ct. App. 2019). “Having concluded Adamson did not receive adequate consideration, it was required to void those transfers pursuant to I.C. § 56-218(2): “Khurana failed to provide evidence to support his argument that adequate consideration was received for the transfer.”
— Idaho Code § 56-218(1) — 8 cases
Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. McCormick, 283 P.3d 785 (Idaho 2012). “Idaho Code § 56-218 provides, in relevant part: (1) Except where exempted or waived in accordance with federal law medical assistance pursuant to this chapter paid on behalf of an individual who was fifty-five (55) years of age or older when the individual received such…”
State v. Est. of Elliott, 108 P.3d 324 (Idaho 2005). “The State of Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (Department) maintains that it is entitled to establish a claim against the estate of Dolores Arlene Elliott (Elliott) pursuant to Idaho Code § 56-218 (2002). The district court affirmed a decision by the magistrate court that…”
H&W v. The Est. of Wiggins, 306 P.3d 201 (Idaho 2013). “Idaho Code § 56-218 (1) provides for the recovery of certain assistance provided by Medicaid: Except where exempted or waived in accordance with federal law medical assistance pursuant to this chapter paid on behalf of an individual who was fifty-five (55) years of age or older…”
H&W v. Cathie Peterson RE: The Est. of Melvin Peterson (deceased), 340 P.3d 1143 (Idaho 2014). “I.C. § 56-218(4](b). In its argument that Melvin Peterson’s retained life estate constitutes a part of his estate under this statute, IDHW relies on the language, “including such assets conveyed to a survivor, heir, or assign of the deceased individual through .”
State v. Est. of Kaminsky, 111 P.3d 121 (Idaho 2005). “The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (Department) filed a petition to “establish” a claim in the Estate of Joe Kaminsky (Estate) for recovery of Medicaid benefits, pursuant to I.C. § 56-218. The magistrate judge denied the Department’s petition for untimeliness.”
— Idaho Code § 56-218(2) — 4 cases
H&W v. Cathie Peterson RE: The Est. of Melvin Peterson (deceased), 340 P.3d 1143 (Idaho 2014). “I.C. § 56-218(4](b). In its argument that Melvin Peterson’s retained life estate constitutes a part of his estate under this statute, IDHW relies on the language, “including such assets conveyed to a survivor, heir, or assign of the deceased individual through .”
H&W v. The Est. of Wiggins, 306 P.3d 201 (Idaho 2013). “Idaho Code § 56-218 (1) provides for the recovery of certain assistance provided by Medicaid: Except where exempted or waived in accordance with federal law medical assistance pursuant to this chapter paid on behalf of an individual who was fifty-five (55) years of age or older…”
IDHW v. Beason (Idaho 2024). “See generally I.C. § 56-218. Idaho law also allows the Department 2 to set aside transfers of real property by Medicaid recipients if the transfers are not supported by adequate consideration.”
DHW v. Khurana (Idaho Ct. App. 2019). “Having concluded Adamson did not receive adequate consideration, it was required to void those transfers pursuant to I.C. § 56-218(2): “Khurana failed to provide evidence to support his argument that adequate consideration was received for the transfer.”
— Idaho Code § 56-218(4) — 2 cases
Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. McCormick, 283 P.3d 785 (Idaho 2012). “Idaho Code § 56-218 provides, in relevant part: (1) Except where exempted or waived in accordance with federal law medical assistance pursuant to this chapter paid on behalf of an individual who was fifty-five (55) years of age or older when the individual received such…”
H&W v. Cathie Peterson RE: The Est. of Melvin Peterson (deceased), 340 P.3d 1143 (Idaho 2014). “I.C. § 56-218(4](b). In its argument that Melvin Peterson’s retained life estate constitutes a part of his estate under this statute, IDHW relies on the language, “including such assets conveyed to a survivor, heir, or assign of the deceased individual through .”
— Idaho Code § 56-218(4)(B) — 1 case
H&W v. Cathie Peterson RE: The Est. of Melvin Peterson (deceased), 340 P.3d 1143 (Idaho 2014). “I.C. § 56-218(4](b). In its argument that Melvin Peterson’s retained life estate constitutes a part of his estate under this statute, IDHW relies on the language, “including such assets conveyed to a survivor, heir, or assign of the deceased individual through .”
— Idaho Code § 56-218(4)(b) — 1 case
H&W v. Cathie Peterson RE: The Est. of Melvin Peterson (deceased), 340 P.3d 1143 (Idaho 2014). “I.C. § 56-218(4](b). In its argument that Melvin Peterson’s retained life estate constitutes a part of his estate under this statute, IDHW relies on the language, “including such assets conveyed to a survivor, heir, or assign of the deceased individual through .”
— Idaho Code § 56-218(5) — 1 case
State v. Est. of Kaminsky, 111 P.3d 121 (Idaho 2005). “The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (Department) filed a petition to “establish” a claim in the Estate of Joe Kaminsky (Estate) for recovery of Medicaid benefits, pursuant to I.C. § 56-218. The magistrate judge denied the Department’s petition for untimeliness.”
— Idaho Code § 56-218(6)(c)(1) — 1 case
Ada Cnty. v. Browning, 489 P.3d 443 (Idaho 2021). “The district court found the County had a right to foreclose on the Lemhi Property on September 3, 2007, because Gloria died on September 3, 2006, and her estate had not been probated, subjecting the County to the conditions of either Idaho Code section 56-218(6)(c)(i) or…”
— Idaho Code § 56-218(6)(c)(i) — 1 case
Ada Cnty. v. Browning, 489 P.3d 443 (Idaho 2021). “The district court found the County had a right to foreclose on the Lemhi Property on September 3, 2007, because Gloria died on September 3, 2006, and her estate had not been probated, subjecting the County to the conditions of either Idaho Code section 56-218(6)(c)(i) or…”
— Idaho Code § 56-218(a) — 1 case
Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. McCormick, 283 P.3d 785 (Idaho 2012). “Idaho Code § 56-218 provides, in relevant part: (1) Except where exempted or waived in accordance with federal law medical assistance pursuant to this chapter paid on behalf of an individual who was fifty-five (55) years of age or older when the individual received such…”
— Idaho Code § 56-218(l) — 1 case
H&W v. Cathie Peterson RE: The Est. of Melvin Peterson (deceased), 340 P.3d 1143 (Idaho 2014). “I.C. § 56-218(4](b). In its argument that Melvin Peterson’s retained life estate constitutes a part of his estate under this statute, IDHW relies on the language, “including such assets conveyed to a survivor, heir, or assign of the deceased individual through .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.