Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 61-307

Schedules — Change in rate and service. 

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Schedules — Change in rate and service. 

Unless the commission otherwise orders, no change shall be made by any public utility in any rate, rental, charge or classification, or in any rule, regulation or contract relating to or affecting any rate, rental, charge, classification or service, or in any privilege or facility, except after thirty (30) days’ notice to the commission and to the public as herein provided. Such notice shall be given by filing with the commission and keeping open for public inspection new schedules stating plainly the change or changes to be made in the schedule or schedules then in force and the time when the change or changes will go into effect. The commission, for good cause shown, may allow changes without requiring the thirty (30) days’ notice herein provided for by an order specifying the changes so to be made and the time when they shall take effect and the manner in which they shall be filed and published. When any change is proposed in any rate, rental, charge or classification, or in any form of contract or agreement, or in any rule, regulation or contract relating to or affecting any rate, rental, charge, classification or service, or in any privilege or facility, attention shall be directed to such change on the schedule filed with the commission by some character to be designated by the commission immediately preceding or following the item.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1976–1992 · leading case: Utah-Idaho Sugar Co. v. Intermountain Gas Co.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Utah-Idaho Sugar Co. v. Intermountain Gas Co. (1979) idaho · cites it 14× “U-1034-38 be suspended because of failure of Intermountain to follow the procedural requirements for submission to the Commission of rate schedule modifications prescribed in I.C. § 61-307. 3 U & I also alleged in its complaint that Intermountain’s meth *372 od of prorating U &…”
Citizens Utilities Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission (1978) idaho · cites it 6× “Idaho Code § 61-307 2 provides that a utility must give both the Commission and the public thirty days notice of any increase in rates.”
Afton Energy, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co. (1984) idaho · cites it 4× “I.C. § 61-307. Contracts entered into by public utilities with CSPPs or decisions by utilities not to contract with CSPPs have a very real effect on the rates paid by consumers both at present and in the future.”
Agricultural Products Corp. v. Utah Power & Light Co. (1976) idaho · cites it 2× “See, I.C. §§ 61-307, 61-502, 61-503, 61-622, 61-623.”
Washington Water Power Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission (1980) idaho · cites it 2× “would otherwise go into effect, pursuant to section 61-307, Idaho Code, unless the commission in its discretion extends the period of suspension for an initial period not exceeding five (5) months, nor unless the commission after a showing of good cause on the record grants an…”
AW Brown Co., Inc. v. Idaho Power Co. (1992) idaho · cites it 2× “I.C. § 61-307 provides, among other things, that a rate may not be changed without thirty days notice to the public.”
Bunker Hill Co. v. Washington Water Power Co. (1977) idaho · cites it 2× “See I.C. §§ 61-307, 502-3, 622-3. Such contracts are protected from governmental interference by the Idaho Constitution, art.”
Intermountain Gas Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission (1977) idaho · cites it 8× “the revenue figures used in computing the revenue deficiency for Case # U-1034-47 incorporated the proposed rate increase in Case # U-1034-48, namely the amount necessary to track Intermountain’s higher gas costs due to participation in the Zama project; (b) the exhibits…”
Snake River Homebuilders Ass'n v. City of Caldwell (1980) idaho · cites it 2× “In appellant’s view, Feil mandates compliance by the city with I.C. § 61-307, which requires that a public utility give thirty days’ notice to the public and the Idaho Public Utilities Commission of any proposed rate or charge increase; and I.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.