Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 67-5270 (2026)

Right of review. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Right of review. 

(1) Judicial review of agency action shall be governed by the provisions of this chapter unless other provision of law is applicable to the particular matter.

(2)  A person aggrieved by final agency action other than an order in a contested case is entitled to judicial review under this chapter if the person complies with the requirements of sections 67-5271 through 67-5279, Idaho Code.
(3)  A party aggrieved by a final order in a contested case decided by an agency other than the industrial commission or the public utilities commission is entitled to judicial review under this chapter if the person complies with the requirements of sections 67-5271 through 67-5279, Idaho Code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 56 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1996–2024 · leading case: Laughy v. Idaho Dep't of Transp., 243 P.3d 1055 (Idaho 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Laughy v. Idaho Dep't of Transp., 243 P.3d 1055 (Idaho 2010). · cites it 62× “Idaho Code § 67-5270 , subsections 2 and 3, allow petitions for review in two different scenarios but neither applies here.”
Taylor v. Canyon Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 210 P.3d 532 (Idaho 2009). · cites it 12× “Likewise, the Vickers do not have a statutory right to judicial review of the Board's decision to amend the 1995 Plan Map.”
Sagewillow, Inc. v. Idaho Dep't of Water Resources, 70 P.3d 669 (Idaho 2003). · cites it 7× “Idaho Code § 67-5270 (3) (2001) provides, "A party aggrieved by a final order in a contested case decided by an agency other than the industrial commission or the public utilities commission *684 is entitled to judicial review under this chapter if the person complies with the…”
Williams v. State, Bd. of Real Est. Appraisers, 239 P.3d 780 (Idaho 2010). · cites it 12× “Idaho Code § 67-5270 (1). No one contends that there is some other provision of law granting the right to judicial review in this case.”
Selkirk-Priest Basin Ass'n v. State ex rel. Batt, 919 P.2d 1032 (Idaho 1996). · cites it 4× “Whether the district court erred in entering summary judgment against SPBA for lack of standing, when SPBA alleged and demonstrated upon summary judgment its standing based on the following three independent grounds: (a) injury to its members’ recreational and aesthetic use of…”
Fuchs v. State, Dep't of Idaho State Police, Bureau of Alcohol Beverage Control, 272 P.3d 1257 (Idaho 2012). · cites it 6× “On August 19, 2009, Fuchs filed a petition for judicial review under I.C. § 67-5270, and amended that petition the next day.”
Allen v. Blaine Cnty., 953 P.2d 578 (Idaho 1998). · cites it 4× “I.C. §§ 67-5270 — 5272. Under the IDAPA, “agency” is defined as “each state board, commission, department or officer authorized by law to make rules or to determine contested eases.”
City of Ririe v. Gilgen, 515 P.3d 255 (Idaho 2022). · cites it 4× “[See, I.C. §§67-5270 et. seq.]” and alleged that the error made by the County was “as contained in I.”
Employers Resource Mgmt Co v. Kealey, 461 P.3d 731 (Idaho 2020). · cites it 4× “” I.C § 67-5270(2). Employers’ arguments that it has been denied an opportunity for judicial review as a competitor are unfounded, as the action of bringing this declaratory judgment plainly manifests.”
Mark Eugene Johnson v. Dept of Transp., 280 P.3d 749 (Idaho Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 8× “84(b)(1), “a petition for judicial review from an agency to district court must be filed with the appropriate district court within twenty-eight (28) days after the agency action is ripe for judicial review under the statute authorizing judicial review,” unless a different time…”
Podsaid v. Outfitters & Guides Licensing, 356 P.3d 363 (Idaho 2015). · cites it 6× “Idaho Code section 67-5270, however, limits judicial review to final agency action and an agency’s final orders in a contested case.”
Comm. for Rational Predator Mgmt. v. Dep't of Agric., 931 P.2d 1188 (Idaho 1997). · cites it 4× “Whether the availability of judicial review of the challenged rules under the Idaho APA, I.C. § 67-5270, represents a “plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law” that *672 precludes CRPM’s action for an extraordinary writ of prohibition and writ of…”
Show all 56 citing cases →
— Idaho Code § 67-5270(1) — 13 cases
Laughy v. Idaho Dep't of Transp., 243 P.3d 1055 (Idaho 2010). “Idaho Code § 67-5270 , subsections 2 and 3, allow petitions for review in two different scenarios but neither applies here.”
Williams v. Idaho State Bd. of Real Est. Appraisers, 337 P.3d 655 (Idaho 2014).
Roberts v. Wyman, 23 P.3d 152 (Idaho Ct. App. 2000).
Podsaid v. Outfitters & Guides Licensing, 356 P.3d 363 (Idaho 2015). “Idaho Code section 67-5270, however, limits judicial review to final agency action and an agency’s final orders in a contested case.”
Idaho Retired Firefighters Ass'n v. Pub. Emp. Ret. Bd., 443 P.3d 207 (Idaho 2019).
— Idaho Code § 67-5270(2) — 10 cases
Laughy v. Idaho Dep't of Transp., 243 P.3d 1055 (Idaho 2010). “Idaho Code § 67-5270 , subsections 2 and 3, allow petitions for review in two different scenarios but neither applies here.”
Employers Resource Mgmt Co v. Kealey, 461 P.3d 731 (Idaho 2020). “” I.C § 67-5270(2). Employers’ arguments that it has been denied an opportunity for judicial review as a competitor are unfounded, as the action of bringing this declaratory judgment plainly manifests.”
Comm. for Rational Predator Mgmt. v. Dep't of Agric., 931 P.2d 1188 (Idaho 1997). “Whether the availability of judicial review of the challenged rules under the Idaho APA, I.C. § 67-5270, represents a “plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law” that *672 precludes CRPM’s action for an extraordinary writ of prohibition and writ of…”
Fuchs v. State, Dep't of Idaho State Police, Bureau of Alcohol Beverage Control, 272 P.3d 1257 (Idaho 2012). “On August 19, 2009, Fuchs filed a petition for judicial review under I.C. § 67-5270, and amended that petition the next day.”
Podsaid v. Outfitters & Guides Licensing, 356 P.3d 363 (Idaho 2015). “Idaho Code section 67-5270, however, limits judicial review to final agency action and an agency’s final orders in a contested case.”
— Idaho Code § 67-5270(3) — 8 cases
Laughy v. Idaho Dep't of Transp., 243 P.3d 1055 (Idaho 2010). “Idaho Code § 67-5270 , subsections 2 and 3, allow petitions for review in two different scenarios but neither applies here.”
Sagewillow, Inc. v. Idaho Dep't of Water Resources, 70 P.3d 669 (Idaho 2003). “Idaho Code § 67-5270 (3) (2001) provides, "A party aggrieved by a final order in a contested case decided by an agency other than the industrial commission or the public utilities commission *684 is entitled to judicial review under this chapter if the person complies with the…”
St. Luke's Health Sys., Ltd. v. Bd. of Commissioners of Gem Cnty., 435 P.3d 1121 (Idaho 2019).
South Valley Ground Water v. ID Dept of Water Resources, 548 P.3d 734 (Idaho 2024).
Mark Eugene Johnson v. Dept of Transp., 280 P.3d 749 (Idaho Ct. App. 2012). “84(b)(1), “a petition for judicial review from an agency to district court must be filed with the appropriate district court within twenty-eight (28) days after the agency action is ripe for judicial review under the statute authorizing judicial review,” unless a different time…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.