Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 72-1323 (2026)

Interested parties.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Interested parties.

"Interested party" with respect to a claim for benefits means the claimant, the claimant’s last regular employer, the employer whose account is chargeable for experience rating purposes, the cost reimbursement employer who may be billed for any portion of benefits claimed, and the director or an authorized representative of any of them; "interested party" with respect to proceedings involving employer liability means the employer and the director or an authorized representative.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases, 1961–1994 · leading case: Fouste v. Dep't of Emp., 540 P.2d 1341 (Idaho 1975).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Fouste v. Dep't of Emp., 540 P.2d 1341 (Idaho 1975). · cites it 4× “§ 72-1323 defines “interested party” as: “The term ‘interested party’ with respect to a claim for benefits means the claimant, the claimant’s last regular employer, the covered employer whose account is chargeable for experience rating purposes, and the director or a duly…”

Dep't of Emp. v. St. Alphonsus Hosp., 561 P.2d 1316 (Idaho 1977). · cites it 4× “See I.C. §§ 72-1323, -1368(e). Later, the Department of Employment, for reasons which do not appear in the record, redetermined that benefits had been erroneously paid.”

Campbell v. Bonneville Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 880 P.2d 252 (Idaho 1994). · cites it 2× “§ 72-1368(f) which incorporates the definition of an “interested party” set forth in I.C. § 72-1323 as including “the Director [of the Department of Employment] or a duly authorized representative.”

Striebeck v. Emp. Sec. Agency, 366 P.2d 589 (Idaho 1961). · cites it 2× ““(e) All interested parties as defined in section 72-1323, shall be entitled to prompt service of notice of determinations and redeterminations.”

Tendoy Area Council v. State, 670 P.2d 1302 (Idaho 1983). · cites it 2× “Prior to the 1980 amendment of I.C. § 72-1323, a cost-reimbursement employer was not listed as an “interested party” under the Employment Security Law, Title' 72, Ch.”

Garrett v. Cline, 394 P.2d 157 (Idaho 1964). · cites it 2× “” I.C. § 72-1323 after defining the term “interested party” in respect to a claim for benefits, then defines the term: “ * * * an ‘interested party’ with respect to proceedings involving employer liability means the employer and the director or a duly authorized representative…”

Adams v. Bingham Cnty. Sheriff's Off., 600 P.2d 1146 (Idaho 1979). · cites it 2× “Although undefined in the Workmen’s Compensation Law, the term “interested party” is defined in I.C. § 72-1323 of the Employment Security Law as follows: “The term ‘interested party’ with respect to a claim for benefits means the claimant, the claimant’s last regular employer,…”

DiIorio v. Potlatch Corp., 690 P.2d 318 (Idaho 1984). · cites it 2× “I.C. § 72-1323. We have had pointed out to us on numerous occasions 1 that the legal division of the Department remains aloof of the administrative handling of claims, and that only in proceedings before the Commission and the Supreme Court does it become involved— and then only…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.