Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 72-712 (2026)

Hearings. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Hearings. 

Upon application of any party to the proceeding, or when ordered by the commission or a member thereof or a hearing officer, referee or examiner, and when issues in a case cannot be resolved by pre-hearing conferences or otherwise, a hearing shall be held for the purpose of determining the issues.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1977–2026 · leading case: Matter of Wilson, 911 P.2d 754 (Idaho 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matter of Wilson, 911 P.2d 754 (Idaho 1996). · cites it 6× “Whether the Commission's determinations as to the disputed charges are supported by substantial, competent evidence.”
Owsley v. Idaho Indus. Com'n, 106 P.3d 455 (Idaho 2005). · cites it 2× “See I.C. § 72-712; J.R.P. X. If the Commission again rules against a claimant at the hearing on the merits, it may be appealed directly to this Court.”
Arreola v. Scentsy, Inc., 531 P.3d 1148 (Idaho 2023). · cites it 4× “I.C. § 72-712 (emphasis added). After an injury or contraction of an occupational disease and during the period of disability the employee, if requested by the employer or ordered by the commission, shall submit himself for examination at reasonable times and places to a duly…”
Boise Orthopedic Clinic v. Idaho State Ins. Fund, 911 P.2d 754 (Idaho 1996). · cites it 6× “Whether the Commission’s determinations as to the disputed charges are supported by substantial, competent evidence.”
Curr v. Curr, 864 P.2d 132 (Idaho 1993). · cites it 2× “I.C. § 72-712. Decisions and orders of the Commission entered at the conclusion of such hearings and entered upon approval of settlement agreements are final and conclusive as to all matters adjudicated.”
Swett v. St. Alphonsus Reg'l Med. Ctr., 29 P.3d 385 (Idaho 2001). · cites it 6× “Finally, Seiniger argues that Idaho Code § 72-712 required a formal adversarial hearing to resolve the issue of attorney fees.”
Coronado v. City of Boise (Idaho 2025). · cites it 20× “” I.C. § 72-712. However, section 72-706 applies a more specific rule: if an employer or surety does not pay compensation, discontinues compensation, or discontinues income benefits, only the claimant-employee may “make and file with the commission an application requesting a…”
Coronado v. City of Boise (Idaho 2025). · cites it 20× “” I.C. § 72-712. However, section 72-706 applies a more specific rule: if an employer or surety does not pay compensation, discontinues compensation, or discontinues income benefits, only the claimant-employee may “make and file with the commission an application requesting a…”
Miklos v. L&W Supply (Idaho 2026). · cites it 14× “Nixon required immediate authorization from the Surety, which was a disputed issue that required a hearing under Idaho Code section 72-712. In addition, counsel for the Respondents indicated that Dr.”
Miklos v. L&W Supply (Idaho 2026). · cites it 14× “Nixon required immediate authorization from the Surety, which was a disputed issue that required a hearing under Idaho Code section 72-712. In addition, counsel for the Respondents indicated that Dr.”
Howard v. FMC Corp., 567 P.2d 10 (Idaho 1977). · cites it 4× “§ 72-701; and the Commission on its own motion set the matter for hearing within one year of the filing of the April 3, 1975, claim for compensation — which was sufficient to satisfy the requirements of I.C. § 72-706. 5 The Commission need not wait for the claimant to file an…”
Swett v. St. Alphonsus Reg'l Med. Ctr., 29 P.3d 385 (Idaho 2001). · cites it 6× “Finally, Seiniger argues that Idaho Code § 72-712 required a formal adversarial hearing to resolve the issue of attorney fees.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.