Idaho Code § 73-116
Common law in force.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Common law in force.
The common law of England, so far as it is not repugnant to, or inconsistent with, the constitution or laws of the United States, in all cases not provided for in these compiled laws, is the rule of decision in all courts of this state.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 60
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1954–2025 · leading case: SCH. DIST. NO. 351 ONEIDA CTY v. Oneida Ed. Ass'n
SCH. DIST. NO. 351 ONEIDA CTY v. Oneida Ed. Ass'n (1977)
“As previously noted, we find no constitutionally guaranteed right to strike in public employees and no such right existed at common law.”
Alegria v. Payonk (1980)
“It rather provides only a superficial gloss to the very large questions of whether the Court should judicially legislate in an area in which the great majority of jurisdictions have acted through their legislature or what policies are served by the overruling of what has been…”
Meade v. Freeman (1969)
“I.C. § 73-116, provides: "The common law of England, so far as it is not repugnant to, or inconsistent with, the constitution or laws of the United States, in all cases not provided for in these compiled laws, is the rule or decision in all courts of this state.”
Bishop v. Owens (2012)
“See I.C. § 73-116 ("The common law of England, so far as it is not repugnant to, or inconsistent with, the constitution or laws of the United States, in all cases not provided for in these compiled laws, is the rule of decision in all courts of this state.”
State v. Pina (2010)
“In 1864, the legislature also adopted what is now codified as I.C. § 73-116 which states: Common law in force.”
State v. Dameniel Preston Owens (2015)
“§ 18-308 to abrogate entirely the common law rule pertaining to consecutive sentences and prohibit the court from imposing consecutive sentences except in the narrow range of cases 1 The Idaho Constitution was subsequently amended in 1978 to permit the Legislature to establish…”
Nation v. State, Dept. of Correction (2007)
“We hold, therefore, that Stoppello and the county are immune from the corrections officers' state law claims because responding to discovery is a quasi-judicial function.”
Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. Evans (1989)
“I.C. § 73-116 states: 73-116. Common law in force.”
Robinson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (2002)
“See I.C. § 73-116; Evans v. Twin Falls County, 118 Idaho 210, 215 , 796 P.”
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Wasden (2018)
“The court is unaware of any recent Idaho cases to the contrary, and the 1976 amendments to the 10 “The common law of England, so far as it is not repugnant to, or inconsistent with, the constitution or laws of the United States, in all cases not provided for in these compiled…”
Evans v. Twin Falls County (1990)
“I.C. § 73-116 provides that the rules of the common law are in effect in Idaho unless modified by other legislative enactments.”
Udy v. Custer County (2001)
“As noted above, the ITD is charged with the responsibility of maintaining Highway 75. See I.C. § 40-201; I.C. § 40-502.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.