Ind. Code § 12-15-11-3

Provider agreement requirements

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 3. A provider agreement must do the following:

(1) Include information that the office determines necessary to facilitate carrying out of IC 12-15.

(2) Prohibit the provider from requiring payment from a recipient of Medicaid, except where a copayment is required by law.

(3) For providers categorized as high risk to the Medicaid program under 42 U.S.C. 1395cc(j)(2)(B) and 42 CFR 455.450, require the submission of necessary information, forms, or consents for the office to obtain a national criminal history background check or, as allowed by the office, a fingerprint-based criminal history check, through a contractor under IC 12-15-30 or the state police department under IC 10-13-3-39 of any person who:

(A) holds at least a five percent (5%) ownership interest in a facility or entity; or

(B) is a member of the board of directors of a nonprofit facility or entity;

in which the provider applicant plans to provide Medicaid services under the provider agreement. The provider applicant is responsible for the cost of the national criminal history background check or fingerprint-based criminal history check.

[Pre-1992 Revision Citation: 12-1-7-15.1(b) part.]

As added by P.L.2-1992, SEC.9. Amended by P.L.197-2013, SEC.12; P.L.35-2016, SEC.38.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2014–2016 · leading case: Bader v. Wernert
Bader v. Wernert (2016) innd · cites it 2× “Further, in addition to Indiana’s statute that provides authority for a without cause termination, Ind. Code § 12-15-11-3 , 18 a non-exhaustive search shows that several other states provide their Medicaid agencies with simi *725 lar authority.”
Umbrella Family Waiver Services, LLC v. Indiana Family and Social Services Administration (2014) indctapp · cites it 2× “2 Furthermore, Indiana Code section 12-15-22-1 does not bar FSSA from adding to provider agreements a paragraph allowing either party to terminate the contract without cause.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.