Sec. 313. (1) Express warranties by the seller are
created as follows:
(a) any affirmation of fact or promise made by the seller to the buyer
which relates to the goods and becomes part of the basis of the bargain
creates an express warranty that the goods shall conform to the
affirmation or promise.
(b) any description of the goods which is made part of the basis of
the bargain creates an express warranty that the goods shall conform to
the description.
(c) any sample or model which is made part of the basis of the
bargain creates an express warranty that the whole of the goods shall
conform to the sample or model.
(2) It is not necessary to the creation of an express warranty that the
seller use formal words such as "warrant" or "guarantee" or that he
have a specific intention to make a warranty, but an affirmation merely
of the value of the goods or a statement purporting to be merely the
seller's opinion or commendation of the goods does not create a
warranty.
Formerly: Acts 1963, c.317, s.2-313.
Notes of Decisions
In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig., 293 F. Supp. 3d 888 (N.D. Cal. 2018).
· cites it 2× “Like with Huawei, the relevant question is whether Plaintiffs must show reliance on the statement or representation for it to be considered part of the "basis of the bargain" under each state's express warranty law.”
Reed v. Cent. Soya Co., Inc., 621 N.E.2d 1069 (Ind. 1993).
· cites it 3× “Code § 26-1-2-313 , as well as implied warranties of merchantability.”
Skalbania v. Simmons, 443 N.E.2d 352 (Ind. Ct. App. 1982).
· cites it 4× “Code Section 26-1-2-313, Express Warranties by Affirmation, Promise, Description and Sample; Ind.”
Perry v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., 814 N.E.2d 634 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “Indiana Code Section 26-1-2-313 defines an express warranty, in part, as "any affirmation of fact or promise made by the seller to the buyer which relates to the goods and becomes part of the basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the goods shall conform to the…”
Atkinson v. P & G-Clairol, Inc., 813 F. Supp. 2d 1021 (N.D. Ind. 2011).
· cites it 2× “Ind. Code § 26-1-2-313 (2010). Atkinson has not pleaded sufficiently to show that she will be able to discover evidence to support a finding of vertical privity as required for claims of breach of express warranty and breach of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular…”
In re Conagra Foods, Inc., 302 F.R.D. 537 (C.D. Cal. 2014).
“• Indiana: (1) Ind.Code § 26-1-2-313; (2) Ind.Code § 26-1-2-314; (3) Unjust Enrichment.”
Carlisle v. Deere & Co., 576 F.3d 649 (7th Cir. 2009).
“See Ind.Code § 26-1-2-313(1)(a). Because Deere’s warranty did not cover a third-party’s wiring of the PPC, we Affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment in Deere’s favor.”
Carpetland U.S.A. v. Payne, 536 N.E.2d 306 (Ind. Ct. App. 1989).
· cites it 2× “Indiana Code section 26-1-2-313 which defines the language by which an express warranty may be created reads as follows: *308 “Express warranties by affirmation, promise, description, sample “Sec.”
Am. Optical Co. v. Weidenhamer, 404 N.E.2d 606 (Ind. Ct. App. 1980).
“” Ind. Code 26-1-2-313, referred to in the objection, provides: “(1) Express warranties by the seller are created as follows: (a) any affirmation of fact or promise made by the seller to the buyer which relates to the goods and becomes part of the basis of the bargain creates an…”
Candlelight Homes, Inc. v. Zornes, 414 N.E.2d 980 (Ind. Ct. App. 1981).
“Ind.Code 26-1-2-313 sets forth the requirements of an express warranty: “(1) Express warranties by the seller are created as follows: (a) any affirmation of fact or promise made by the seller to the buyer which relates to the goods and becomes part of the basis of the bargain…”
— Ind. Code § 26-1-2-313(1) — 2 cases
— Ind. Code § 26-1-2-313(1)(a) — 1 case
Carlisle v. Deere & Co., 576 F.3d 649 (7th Cir. 2009).
“See Ind.Code § 26-1-2-313(1)(a). Because Deere’s warranty did not cover a third-party’s wiring of the PPC, we Affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment in Deere’s favor.”
— Ind. Code § 26-1-2-313(1)(b) — 1 case
— Ind. Code § 26-1-2-313(2) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.