Ind. Code § 36-9-2-18

Extraterritorial powers; four mile limit

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 18. A municipality may exercise powers granted by sections 2, 3, 14, 16, and 17 of this chapter in areas within four (4) miles outside its corporate boundaries.

[Pre-Local Government Recodification Citations: 18-1-1.5-7 part; 18-1-1.5-14 part; 18-3-1-50 part.]

As added by Acts 1980, P.L.211, SEC.4.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2001–2020 · leading case: Town of Plainfield v. Town of Avon
Town of Plainfield v. Town of Avon (2001) indctapp · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code § 36-9-2-18. Furthermore, Indiana Code section 36-9-28-36 provides that a municipality may exercise jurisdiction to provide sewage works within ten (10) miles outside its corporate boundaries.”
Farley Neighborhood Ass'n v. Town of Speedway (2001) indctapp · cites it 2× “We note that Indiana Code section 36-9-2-18 allows a municipality to exercise its power *1139 to control disposal of sewage up to four (4) miles outside its corporate boundaries.”
Town of Newburgh v. Town of Chandler (2013) indctapp · cites it 2× “Section 36-9-2-18 further provides that "[a] municipality may exercise powers granted by sections 2, 8, 14, 16, and 17 of this chapter in areas within four (4) miles outside its corporate boundaries.”
Delaware County Regional Wastewater District v. Muncie Sanitary District (2020) indctapp · cites it 5× “Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 19A-EX-2964 | July 22, 2020 Page 4 of 21 [5] I.C. § 36-9-2-18 allows municipalities, including MSD, to “exercise powers” – in this case, provide sewer service – within four miles of their boundaries.”
BROWN COUNTY WATER UTILITY, INC. v. TOWN OF NASHVILLE, INDIANA (2019) insd “Code § 36-9-2-18 (emphasis added). Nashville did not need to annex the property to serve Big Woods, and Nashville did not need to have the IURC establish an exclusive water service area, under state law, to serve Big Woods.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.