Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 6-3-1-3 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Formerly: Acts 1963(ss), c.32, s.103; Acts 1965, c.233, s.1; Acts 1969, c.326, s.1. Repealed by Acts 1980, P.L.54, SEC.9.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2026 · leading case: Dep't of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis, 553 U.S. 328 (2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Dep't of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis, 553 U.S. 328 (2008). “Of the remaining States, Utah exempts its own bonds, and extends reciprocal treatment to the bonds of States that do not tax Utah bonds, see Utah Code Ann.”

Green v. Klinkofe, 422 F. Supp. 1021 (N.D. Ind. 1976). · cites it 2× “Code §§ 6 — 3—1—1 to 6-3-7-4 (Burns 1972), as amended, Ind. Code §§ 6-3-1-3 .1 to 6-3.5-3-13 (Burns Supp.”

E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Indiana Dep't of State Revenue, 79 N.E.3d 1016 (Ind. T.C. 2017). · cites it 2× “, Ind. Code § 6-3-1-3 .5(b) (2007); Subaru-Isuzu, 782 N.”

William R. Larsen v. Indiana Dep't of State Revenue, 80 N.E.3d 289 (Ind. T.C. 2017). · cites it 2× “Ind. Code § 6-3-1-3 .5(a) (2013). This starting point is then modified by various statutory add-backs and deductions.”

PENN Ent., Inc. (f/k/a Penn Nat'l Gaming, Inc.) v. Dep't Of State Revenue (Ind. 2026). · cites it 2× “” Ind. Code § 6-3-1-3 .5(b)(3). In this case, PENN Entertainment, Inc.”

EMC Corp. v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Pub. Accounts of the State of Texas & Ken Paxton, Attorney Gen. of the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2015). “" Ind. Code § 6-3-1-3 .5(b) (emphasis added).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.