Ind. Code § 9-24-9-2

Information required by application for license or permit

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 2. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), each application for a driver's license or permit under this chapter must require the following information:

(1) The full legal name of the applicant.

(2) The applicant's date of birth.

(3) The gender of the applicant.

(4) The applicant's height, weight, hair color, and eye color.

(5) The address of the applicant.

(6) A:

(A) valid Social Security number; or

(B) verification of an applicant's:

(i) ineligibility to be issued a Social Security number;

(ii) identity; and

(iii) lawful status.

(7) Whether the applicant has been subject to fainting spells or seizures.

(8) Whether the applicant has been issued a driver's license or has been the holder of a permit, and if so, when and by what jurisdiction.

(9) Whether the applicant's driver's license or permit has ever been suspended or revoked, and if so, the date of and the reason for the suspension or revocation.

(10) Whether the applicant has been convicted of:

(A) a crime punishable as a felony under Indiana motor vehicle law; or

(B) any other felony in the commission of which a motor vehicle was used;

that has not been expunged by a court.

(11) Whether the applicant has a physical or mental disability, and if so, the nature of the disability.

(12) The signature of the applicant showing the applicant's legal name as it appears or will appear on the driver's license or permit.

(13) A digital photograph of the applicant.

(14) Any other information the bureau requires.

(b) For purposes of subsection (a), an individual certified as a program participant in the address confidentiality program under IC 5-26.5 is not required to provide the individual's address, but may provide an address designated by the office of the attorney general under IC 5-26.5 as the individual's address.

(c) In addition to the information required by subsection (a), an applicant who is required to complete at least fifty (50) hours of supervised practice driving under IC 9-24-3-2.5(a)(1)(E), IC 9-24-3-2.5(a)(2)(D), or IC 9-24-3-2.5(a)(6)(F) must submit to the bureau evidence of the time logged in practice driving.

[Pre-1991 Recodification Citation: 9-1-4-32(b).]

As added by P.L.2-1991, SEC.12. Amended by P.L.39-2000, SEC.10; P.L.138-2001, SEC.1; P.L.176-2001, SEC.12; P.L.1-2002, SEC.44; P.L.123-2005, SEC.2; P.L.184-2007, SEC.34; P.L.145-2011, SEC.17; P.L.118-2011, SEC.3; P.L.6-2012, SEC.68; P.L.125-2012, SEC.203; P.L.85-2013, SEC.37; P.L.77-2015, SEC.1; P.L.149-2015, SEC.65; P.L.198-2016, SEC.463; P.L.178-2019, SEC.46; P.L.211-2023, SEC.37; P.L.141-2024, SEC.22; P.L.227-2025, SEC.28.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 2005–2018 · leading case: Leone v. COM'R, BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Leone v. COM'R, BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES (2010) ind · cites it 16× “Ind. Code §§ 9-24-9-2 ; 9-24-16-2. The Social Security Administration is as logical an anchor as any to accomplish this end.”

Villegas v. Silverman (2005) indctapp · cites it 6× “The BMV argues on appeal that the trial court "correctly determined that the named plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge [the] BMV's identification requirements for applicants for driver licenses" because Indiana Code § 9-24-9-2 "requires that applicants for driver's…”

Doe v. Holcomb (2018) ca7 · cites it 2× “%20Code%20%C2%A7%209-24-9-2"> Ind. Code § 9-24-9-2 (1) (2016).”

Leone v. Commissioner, Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles (2009) indctapp · cites it 4× “During this process, we received a message indicating that your name listed in BMV records does not match what is on file with the SSA and must be updated immediately pursuant to Indiana Code §§ 9-24-9-2 or X-XX-XX-X.5. If you have recently updated this information, please…”

Baird v. State (2011) indctapp · cites it 2× “Baird’s original conviction under Indiana Code section 9-24-19-2 requires all the same elements of section 9-24-19-1 with the additional requirement that the State show specifically which Indiana Code section the defendant previously violated to trigger section 9-24-9-2. Thus,…”

State v. Gearlds (2011) indctapp · cites it 4× “This is because the plain language of Section 9-24-9-2 provides that less than ten years must have elapsed between (1) the date that the judgment was entered for the prior unrelated violation and (2) the date that the violation described “in subdivision 1” (that is, the date of…”

— Ind. Code § 9-24-9-2(a) — 1 case

Leone v. COM'R, BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES (2010) ind “Ind. Code §§ 9-24-9-2 ; 9-24-16-2. The Social Security Administration is as logical an anchor as any to accomplish this end.”

— Ind. Code § 9-24-9-2(b) — 1 case

Leone v. COM'R, BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES (2010) ind “Ind. Code §§ 9-24-9-2 ; 9-24-16-2. The Social Security Administration is as logical an anchor as any to accomplish this end.”

— Ind. Code § 9-24-9-2(b)(1) — 1 case

Leone v. COM'R, BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES (2010) ind “Ind. Code §§ 9-24-9-2 ; 9-24-16-2. The Social Security Administration is as logical an anchor as any to accomplish this end.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.