Iowa Code
Iowa Code § 4.10 (2026)
Reenactment of statutes — continuation
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A statute which is reenacted, revised or amended is intended to be a continuation of the prior statute and not a new enactment, so far as it is the same as the prior statute. [C73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §4.10]
\nNotes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1953–2026 · leading case: State of Iowa v. Vernon Lee Huser, 894 N.W.2d 472 (Iowa 2017).
State of Iowa v. Vernon Lee Huser, 894 N.W.2d 472 (Iowa 2017). “Bergman & Nancy Hollander, Wharton’s Criminal Evidence § 4.10, at 319 (15th ed. 1997). Yet, in order to apply this type of rule, a decision must be made as to “what grouping constitutes a fair and reasonably complete unit of material.”
Hyler v. Garner, 548 N.W.2d 864 (Iowa 1996). “Allan Farnsworth, Farns-worth on Contracts § 4.10 (1990). Fraudulent inducement also gives rise to a tort claim for damages.”
State v. DeCamp, 622 N.W.2d 290 (Iowa 2001). “Iowa Code § 4.10 ; 1A Singer § 22.33, at 290-91.”
State v. Gorham, 206 N.W.2d 908 (Iowa 1973). “See generally The Code 1973, Section 4.10. In other words the dominant legislative purpose in enacting § 795.”
Wieslander v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., 596 N.W.2d 516 (Iowa 1999). “at 671 ; Iowa Code § 4.10 ; Annotation, Effect of Simultaneous Repeal and *523 Re-enactment of All, or Part, of Legislative Act, 77 A.”
Davenport Cmty. Sch. Dist. v. Iowa Civil Rights Comm'n, 277 N.W.2d 907 (Iowa 1979). “Written and unwritten employment policies and practices involving matters such as the commencement and duration of leave, the availability of extensions, the accrual of seniority and other benefits and privileges, reinstatement, and payment under any health or temporary…”
Bokhoven v. Klinker, 474 N.W.2d 553 (Iowa 1991). “Best, Comparative Negligence § 4.10[2][c] (1991); V. Schwartz, Comparative Negligence § 7.”
Fleur De Lis Motor Inns, Inc. v. Bair, 301 N.W.2d 685 (Iowa 1981). “That body could enact a compulsory hotel-motel tax throughout the state, and it could subsequently modify or repeal the tax. As stated in 71 Am.”
Gannett v. Cook, 61 N.W.2d 703 (Iowa 1953). “, section 4.10, page 23, the rule is stated: “Generally it is held that a provision in a statute or in a municipal charter that it shall not take effect unless it is assented to by a majority or fixed percentage of the inhabitants of the municipality is not invalid as a…”
Munz v. State, 382 N.W.2d 693 (Iowa Ct. App. 1985). “LaFave, Search and Seizure § 4.10(b) at 154 (1978). Therefore, even if the warrant-executing officers did in fact search jars and canisters of foodstuffs, as Munz alleges, these were legitimate locations to be searched given the size of the objects to be seized.”
State v. Wilson, 314 N.W.2d 408 (Iowa 1982). “§ 4.10. Moreover, we have held that parole board decisions are subject to judicial review under the Iowa Administrative Procedure Act.”
Bailey v. Lancaster, 470 N.W.2d 351 (Iowa 1991). “LaFave Search and Seizure § 4.10, at 161 (1978)_ This is not to suggest that destruction of property necessarily violates the Fourth Amendment.”
— Iowa Code § 4.10(b) — 2 cases
Munz v. State, 382 N.W.2d 693 (Iowa Ct. App. 1985). “LaFave, Search and Seizure § 4.10(b) at 154 (1978). Therefore, even if the warrant-executing officers did in fact search jars and canisters of foodstuffs, as Munz alleges, these were legitimate locations to be searched given the size of the objects to be seized.”
State of Iowa v. Andrew Jay Porter (Iowa 2026).
— Iowa Code § 4.10(c) — 1 case
State of Iowa v. Joseph Nathan Cruz (Iowa Ct. App. 2025).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.