Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 490.851 (2026)

Permissible indemnification

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a corporation may indemnify an individual who is a party to a proceeding because the individual is a director against liability incurred in the proceeding if any of the following apply: a. All of the following apply: (1) The director’s conduct was in good faith. (2) The director reasonably believed: (a) In the case of conduct in an official capacity, that the director’s conduct was in the best interests of the corporation. (b) In all other cases, that the director’s conduct was at least not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. (3) In the case of any criminal proceeding, the director had no reasonable cause to believe the director’s conduct was unlawful. b. The director engaged in conduct for which broader indemnification has been made permissible or obligatory under a provision of the articles of incorporation, as authorized by section 490.202, subsection 2, paragraph “e”. 2. A director’s conduct with respect to an employee benefit plan for a purpose the director reasonably believed to be in the interests of the participants in, and the beneficiaries of, the plan is conduct that satisfies the requirement of subsection 1, paragraph “a”, subparagraph (2), subparagraph division (b). 3. The termination of a proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, or conviction, or upon\n\nTue Dec 09 22:07:43 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 490 (142, 1) §490.851, BUSINESS CORPORATIONS 68\n\na plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, is not, of itself, determinative that the director did not meet the relevant standard of conduct described in this section. 4. Unless ordered by a court under section 490.854, subsection 1, paragraph “c”, a corporation shall not indemnify a director in any of the following circumstances: a. In connection with a proceeding by or in the right of the corporation, except for expenses incurred in connection with the proceeding if it is determined that the director has met the relevant standard of conduct under subsection 1. b. In connection with any proceeding with respect to conduct for which the director was adjudged liable on the basis of receiving a financial benefit to which the director was not entitled, regardless of whether it involved action in the director’s official capacity. 89 Acts, ch 288, §99; 2002 Acts, ch 1154, §45, 125; 2003 Acts, ch 44, §84, 116; 2021 Acts, ch 165, §111, 230 Referred to in §490.854, 490.855, 490.858, 491.3, 491.16, 497.34, 498.36, 499.59A, 508C.16, 524.801

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2023 · leading case: RS Indus., Inc. v. Candrian, 377 P.3d 329 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
RS Indus., Inc. v. Candrian, 377 P.3d 329 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “to the fullest extent possible, against all obligations, including attorney’s fees ... and reasonable expenses actually incurred by such director .”
In re Internet Navigator Inc., 293 B.R. 198 (Bankr. D. Iowa 2003). · cites it 4× “855 relates back to section 490.851. Iowa Code section 490.851 conditionally authorizes a corporation to indemnify an individual who was made a party to a proceeding because the individual is or was a director.”
Hanrahan v. Kruidenier, 473 N.W.2d 184 (Iowa 1991). · cites it 2× “For a new somewhat similar provision see Iowa Code § 490.851 (1991) et seq.”
Hora v. Hora (Iowa Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “We find no basis for permissive indemnification under section 490.851, given the evidence and arguments made below.”
Carolyn Ahrens, Substituted for Richard Ahrens v. Ahrens Agric. Indus. Co., A/K/A Miraco & B. Carter Thomson, & Mike Witt & Susan Witt (Iowa Ct. App. 2015). “Iowa Code § 490.851 (1), et seq. Credible evidence vouches for the good faith exercised by Mike and Susan in their acts that were indeed fair to Miraco and served the best interests of both the corporation and its shareholders.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.