The purpose of this chapter is to promote the public welfare by regulating insurance
rates to the end that they shall not be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory, and
to authorize and regulate cooperative action among insurers in rate making and in other
matters within the scope of this chapter. Nothing in this chapter is intended to prohibit
or discourage reasonable competition, or to prohibit, or encourage except to the extent
necessary to accomplish the aforementioned purpose, uniformity in insurance rates, rating
systems, rating plans or practices. This chapter shall be liberally interpreted to carry into
effect the provisions of this section.
[C50, 54, 58, 62, §515A.1, 515B.1; C66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §515A.1]
\n
Notes of Decisions
Chartis Ins. F/K/A Am. Int'l Grp., Inc. v. Iowa Ins. Comm'r, 831 N.W.2d 119 (Iowa 2013).
· cites it 36× “” See Iowa Code § 515A.1. After reviewing the briefs, the Commissioner found, “NCCI employee classification rules approved by the agency for use by workers’ compensation carriers in calculating premium rates cannot override the broad review authority the legislature granted the…”
Travelers Indem. Co. v. Comm'r of Ins. of the State, 767 N.W.2d 646 (Iowa 2009).
· cites it 3× “See Iowa Code §§ 515A.1 (2005) (the purpose of chapter 515A is to “promote the public welfare by regulating insurance rates to the end that they shall not be excessive”); 515A.”
The Travelers Indem. Co. Vs. D.j. Franzen, Inc., 792 N.W.2d 242 (Iowa 2010).
· cites it 2× “2d 646, 650 (Iowa 2009) (citing Iowa Code section 515A.1 for the proposition that chapter 515A’s purpose “is to promote the public welfare by regulating insurance rates to the end that they shall not be excessive”).”
Travelers Indem. Co. Vs. Comm'r Of Ins. Of The State Of Iowa (Iowa 2009).
“§ 515A.1 (stating the purpose of the workers’ compensation liability insurance chapter of the Iowa Code is “to promote the public welfare by regulating 10 insurance rates to the end that they shall not be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.