Iowa Code § 627.6

General exemptions

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A debtor who is a resident of this state may hold exempt from execution the following property: 1. The debtor’s interest in: a. Any wedding or engagement ring owned or received by the debtor or the debtor’s dependents. However, any interest acquired in one or more wedding or engagement rings owned or received by the debtor or the debtor’s dependents after the date of marriage and within two years of the date the execution is issued or an exemption is claimed shall not

\n

Tue Dec 09 21:59:00 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 627 (23, 0) §627.6, EXEMPTIONS 2\n\nexceed a value equal to seven thousand dollars in the aggregate minus the amount claimed by the debtor for any other jewelry claimed in paragraph “b”. b. All jewelry of the debtor and the debtor’s dependents owned or received by the debtor or the debtor’s dependents, not to exceed in value two thousand dollars in the aggregate. 2. One shotgun, and either one rifle or one musket. 3. Private libraries, family bibles, portraits, pictures and paintings not to exceed in value one thousand dollars in the aggregate. 4. An interment space or an interest in a public or private burying ground, not exceeding one acre for any defendant. 5. The debtor’s interest in all wearing apparel of the debtor and the debtor’s dependents kept for actual use and the trunks or other receptacles necessary for the wearing apparel, musical instruments, household furnishings, and household goods which include, but are not limited to, appliances, radios, television sets, record or tape playing machines, compact disc players, satellite dishes, cable television equipment, computers, software, printers, digital video disc players, video players, and cameras held primarily for the personal, family, or household use of the debtor and the debtor’s dependents, not to exceed in value seven thousand dollars in the aggregate. 6. The interest of an individual in any accrued dividend or interest, loan or cash surrender value of, or any other interest in a life insurance policy owned by the individual if the beneficiary of the policy is the individual’s spouse, child, or dependent. However, the amount of the exemption shall not exceed ten thousand dollars in the aggregate of any interest or value in insurance acquired within two years of the date execution is issued or exemptions are claimed, or for additions within the same time period to a prior existing policy which additions are in excess of the amount necessary to fund the amount of face value coverage of the policies for the two-year period. For purposes of this unnumbered paragraph, acquisitions shall not include such interest in new policies used to replace prior policies to the extent of any accrued dividend or interest, loan or cash surrender value of, or any other interest in the prior policies at the time of their cancellation. a. In the absence of a written agreement or assignment to the contrary, upon the death of the insured any benefit payable to the spouse, child, or dependent of the individual under a life insurance policy shall inure to the separate use of the beneficiary independently of the insured’s creditors. b. A benefit or indemnity paid under an accident, health, or disability insurance policy is exempt to the insured or in case of the insured’s death to the spouse, child, or dependent of the insured, from the insured’s debts. c. In case of an insured’s death the avails of all matured policies of life, accident, health, or disability insurance payable to the surviving spouse, child, or dependent are exempt from liability for all debts of the beneficiary contracted prior to death of the insured, but the amount thus exempted shall not exceed fifteen thousand dollars in the aggregate. 7. Professionally prescribed health aids for the debtor or a dependent of the debtor. 8. The debtor’s rights in: a. A social security benefit, unemployment compensation, or any public assistance benefit. b. A veteran’s benefit. c. A disability or illness benefit. d. Alimony, support, or separate maintenance, to the extent reasonably necessary for the support of the debtor and dependents of the debtor. e. A payment or a portion of a payment under a pension, annuity, or similar plan or contract on account of illness, disability, death, age, or length of service, unless the payment or a portion of the payment results from contributions to the plan or contract by the debtor within one year prior to the filing of a bankruptcy petition, which contributions are above the normal and customary contributions under the plan or contract, in which case the portion of the payment attributable to the contributions above the normal and customary rate is not exempt. f. (1) Contributions and assets, including the accumulated earnings and market increases in value, in any of the plans or contracts as follows:

\n

Tue Dec 09 21:59:00 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 627 (23, 0) 3 EXEMPTIONS, §627.6\n\n (a) All transfers, in any amount, from a trust forming part of a stock, bonus, pension, or profit-sharing plan of an employer defined in section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and of which the trust assets are exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as codified at 29 U.S.C. §1001 et seq., to either of the following: (i) A succeeding trust authorized under federal law on or after April 25, 2001. (ii) An individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity established under section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, from which the total value, including accumulated earnings and market increases in value, may be contributed to a succeeding trust authorized under federal law on or after April 25, 2001. For purposes of this subparagraph division, transfers, in any amount, from an individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity established under section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code to an individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity established under section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or an individual retirement account established under section 408(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, or an individual retirement annuity established under section 408(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a Roth individual retirement account, or a Roth individual retirement annuity established under section 408A of the Internal Revenue Code are exempt. (b) (i) All transfers, in any amount, from an eligible retirement plan to an individual retirement account, an individual retirement annuity, a Roth individual retirement account, or a Roth individual retirement annuity established under section 408A of the Internal Revenue Code shall be exempt from execution and from the claims of creditors. (ii) As used in this subparagraph division, “eligible retirement plan” means the funds or assets in any retirement plan established under state or federal law that meet all of the following requirements: (A) Can be transferred to an individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity established under sections 408(a) and 408(b) of the Internal Revenue Code or Roth individual retirement accounts and Roth individual retirement annuities established under section 408A of the Internal Revenue Code. (B) Are either exempt from execution under state or federal law or are excluded from a bankruptcy estate under 11 U.S.C. §541(c)(2) et seq. (c) Retirement plans established pursuant to qualified domestic relations orders, as defined in 26 U.S.C. §414. However, nothing in this section shall be construed as making any retirement plan exempt from the claims of the beneficiary of a qualified domestic relations order or from claims for child support or alimony. (d) For simplified employee pension plans, self-employed pension plans (also known as Keogh plans or H.R. 10 plans), individual retirement accounts established under section 408(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, individual retirement annuities established under section 408(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, savings incentive matched plans for employees, salary reduction simplified employee pension plans (also known as SARSEPs), and similar plans for retirement investments authorized in the future under federal law, the exemption for contributions shall not exceed, for each tax year of contributions, the actual amount of the contribution deducted on the debtor’s tax return or the maximum amount which could be contributed to an individual retirement account established under section 408(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and deducted in the tax year of the contribution, whichever is less. The exemption for accumulated earnings and market increases in value of plans under this subparagraph division shall be limited to an amount determined by multiplying all the accumulated earnings and market increases in value by a fraction, the numerator of which is the total amount of exempt contributions as determined by this subparagraph division, and the denominator of which is the total of exempt and nonexempt contributions to the plan. (e) For Roth individual retirement accounts and Roth individual retirement annuities established under section 408A of the Internal Revenue Code and similar plans for retirement investments authorized in the future under federal law, the exemption for contributions shall not exceed, for each tax year of contributions, the actual amount of the contribution or the maximum amount which federal law allows to be contributed to such plans. The exemption for accumulated earnings and market increases in value of plans under this subparagraph

\n

Tue Dec 09 21:59:00 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 627 (23, 0) §627.6, EXEMPTIONS 4\n\ndivision shall be limited to an amount determined by multiplying all of the accumulated earnings and market increases in value by a fraction, the numerator of which is the total amount of exempt contributions as determined by this subparagraph division, and the denominator of which is the total of exempt and nonexempt contributions to the plan. (f) For all contributions to plans described in subparagraph divisions (d) and (e), the maximum contribution in each of the two tax years preceding the claim of exemption or filing of a bankruptcy shall be limited to the maximum deductible contribution to an individual retirement account established under section 408(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, regardless of which plan for retirement investment has been chosen by the debtor. (g) Exempt assets transferred from any individual retirement account, individual retirement annuity, Roth individual retirement account, or Roth individual retirement annuity to any other individual retirement account, individual retirement annuity, Roth individual retirement annuity, or Roth individual retirement account established under section 408A of the Internal Revenue Code shall continue to be exempt regardless of the number of times transferred between individual retirement accounts, individual retirement annuities, Roth individual retirement annuities, or Roth individual retirement accounts. (2) For purposes of this paragraph “f”, “market increases in value” shall include, but shall not be limited to, dividends, stock splits, interest, and appreciation. “Contributions” means contributions by the debtor and by the debtor’s employer. 9. The debtor’s interest in one motor vehicle, not to exceed in value seven thousand dollars. 10. In the event of a bankruptcy proceeding, the debtor’s interest in accrued wages and in state and federal tax refunds as of the date of filing of the petition in bankruptcy, not to exceed one thousand dollars in the aggregate. This exemption is in addition to the limitations contained in sections 642.21 and 537.5105. 11. If the debtor is engaged in any profession or occupation other than farming, the proper implements, professional books, or tools of the trade of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor, not to exceed in value ten thousand dollars in the aggregate. 12. If the debtor is engaged in farming and does not exercise the delay of the enforceability of a deficiency judgment or general execution under section 654.6 in relation to the execution under which the exemption is claimed, any combination of the following, not to exceed a value of ten thousand dollars in the aggregate: a. Implements and equipment reasonably related to a normal farming operation. This exemption is in addition to a motor vehicle held exempt under subsection 9. b. Livestock and feed for the livestock reasonably related to a normal farming operation. 13. If the debtor is engaged in farming the agricultural land upon the commencement of an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage on the agricultural land or for the enforcement of an obligation secured by a mortgage on the agricultural land, if a deficiency judgment is issued against the debtor, and if the debtor does not exercise the delay of the enforceability of the deficiency judgment or general execution under section 654.6 in relation to the execution under which the exemption is claimed, the disposable earnings of the debtor are exempt from garnishment to enforce the deficiency judgment after two years from the entry of the deficiency judgment, sections 642.21 and 642.22 notwithstanding. However, earnings paid to the debtor directly or indirectly by the debtor are not exempt. 14. The debtor’s interest, not to exceed one thousand dollars in the aggregate, in any cash on hand, bank deposits, credit union share drafts, or other deposits, wherever situated, or in any other personal property whether otherwise exempt or not under this chapter. 15. a. The debtor’s interest, not to exceed five hundred dollars in the aggregate, in any combination of the following property: (1) Any residential rental deposit held by a landlord as a security deposit, as well as any interest earned on such deposit as a result of any statute or rule requiring that such deposit be placed in an interest-bearing account. (2) Any residential utility deposit held by any electric, gas, telephone, or water company as a condition for initiation or reinstatement of such utility service, as well as any interest earned on such deposit as a result of any statute or rule requiring that such deposit be placed in an interest-bearing account.

\n

Tue Dec 09 21:59:00 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 627 (23, 0) 5 EXEMPTIONS, §627.10\n\n (3) Any rent paid to the landlord in advance of the date due under any unexpired residential lease. b. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection, a debtor shall not be permitted to claim these exemptions against a landlord or utility company, with regard to sums held under the terms of a rental agreement, or for utility services furnished to the debtor. 16. The debtor’s interest in payments reasonably necessary for the support of the debtor or the debtor’s dependents to or for the benefit of the debtor or the debtor’s dependents, including structured settlements, resulting from personal injury to the debtor or the debtor’s dependents or the wrongful death of a decedent upon which the debtor or the debtor’s dependents were dependent. 17. The debtor’s interest, whether as participant or beneficiary, in contributions and assets, including the accumulated earnings and market increases in value, held in an account in the Iowa educational savings plan trust organized under chapter 12D. [C51, §1898, 1899; R60, §3304, 3305, 3308; C73, §3072; C97, §4008; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §11760; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §627.6; 81 Acts, ch 182, §3] 86 Acts, ch 1216, §4 – 6; 88 Acts, ch 1255, §3 – 7; 92 Acts, ch 1061, §1, 2; 96 Acts, ch 1136, §1; 99 Acts, ch 131, §1 – 3; 2001 Acts, ch 80, §1 – 4; 2001 Acts, ch 176, §77; 2006 Acts, ch 1086, §1, 2; 2007 Acts, ch 114, §1; 2007 Acts, ch 126, §104; 2010 Acts, ch 1059, §1; 2013 Acts, ch 30, §188, 189, 261; 2018 Acts, ch 1161, §146 – 148 Referred to in §627.6A Exemptions denied for violators of alcoholic beverage laws, §123.113 Judgment for exempt property, §643.22 Subsection 17 applies retroactively to January 1, 2018, for withdrawals from the Iowa educational savings plan trust made on or after that date; 2018 Acts, ch 1161, §148

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 156 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1946–2026 · leading case: In Re Bailey
In Re Bailey (2004) iasb · cites it 47× “Iowa Code § 627.6 (9)(b) (emphasis added).”
In Re Punke (1987) ianb · cites it 37× “00 pursuant to the 1986 amendment to Iowa Code § 627.6 1 which took effect before the bankruptcy petition was filed but after the obli *939 gations to the affected creditors arose.”
Matter of Davis (1991) iasb · cites it 19× “On schedule B-4 (property scheduled as exempt) the debtor cited Iowa Code § 627.6 (c) and § 642.21 and claimed $1,079 in exempt wages and tax refunds.”
Wilson v. Sergeant (In Re Wilson) (2004) ianb · cites it 38× “” The Wilsons claimed the property was exempt under Iowa Code § 627.6 (8)(a), which exempts from bankruptcy proceedings any property that constitutes “[a] social security benefit, unemployment compensation, or any public assistance benefit.”
Matter of Pettit (1985) iasb · cites it 18× “Any plan or contract exhibiting these characteristics should be exempt under Iowa Code § 627.6 (9)(e). Reviewing the Debtor’s Plan and based on the findings of fact, the court finds that: 1.”
In Re Pepmeyer (2002) iand · cites it 31× “Pepmeyer (hereinafter Debtor) appeals an adverse decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Iowa, in which the court held that Debtor’s individual retirement annuity is not an exempt asset under Iowa Code § 627.6 (8)(f). This appeal comes before…”
In Re Wiley (1995) iand · cites it 30× “kruptcy court for the Northern District of Iowa, the debtor asserts error in the bankruptcy court judge’s determination that an annuity in favor of the debtor as a settlement for a personal injury lawsuit was an asset of the estate and the bankruptcy court judge’s further…”
In Re Indvik (1990) ianb · cites it 17× “As the statutory basis for the claim, they cited Iowa Code § 627.6 (11). The amended schedules, filed February 16, 1989, provided an itemized list of machinery and equipment showing the full value of each item and the value of the one-half interest claimed to be owned by Lowell…”
In Re Flygstad (1986) ianb · cites it 11× “This is clearly contemplated by the very nature of the exemptions in Iowa Code § 627.6 (9). An interest in future payments necessarily includes an interest in the present assets from which those payments will be made.”
Eilbert v. Pelican (1997) bap8 · cites it 24× “On Schedule C, the debtor claimed as exempt her interest in the annuity payments and corpus under Iowa Code § 627.6 (8)(e). Pelican and the Chapter 7 trustee, Anita L.”
In Re Longstreet (2000) iasb · cites it 19× “On November 29, 1999 they amended their Schedule C (Property Claimed as Exempt) to include a claim of exemption in their EIC under Iowa Code § 627.6 (8)(a). That section permits a debtor, who is an Iowa resident, to exempt from execution his or her rights in “[a] social security…”
Matter of Towns (1987) iasb · cites it 22× “3 The Iowa legislature amended section 627.6 by increasing the maximum farm machinery exemption to $10,000.”
— Iowa Code § 627.6(1) — 1 case
In Re Bailey (2004) iasb “Iowa Code § 627.6 (9)(b) (emphasis added).”
— Iowa Code § 627.6(10) — 9 cases
Matter of Van Pelt (1987) iasb
Matter of Knight (1987) iasb
Matter of Honomichl (1987) iasb
In Re Graettinger (1988) ianb
Matter of Towns (1987) iasb “3 The Iowa legislature amended section 627.6 by increasing the maximum farm machinery exemption to $10,000.”
— Iowa Code § 627.6(10)(c) — 1 case
Matter of Towns (1987) iasb “3 The Iowa legislature amended section 627.6 by increasing the maximum farm machinery exemption to $10,000.”
— Iowa Code § 627.6(10)(d) — 3 cases
In Re Punke (1987) ianb “00 pursuant to the 1986 amendment to Iowa Code § 627.6 1 which took effect before the bankruptcy petition was filed but after the obli *939 gations to the affected creditors arose.”
Matter of Towns (1987) iasb “3 The Iowa legislature amended section 627.6 by increasing the maximum farm machinery exemption to $10,000.”
In re Erickson (1987) iand
— Iowa Code § 627.6(11) — 9 cases
In Re Bailey (2004) iasb “Iowa Code § 627.6 (9)(b) (emphasis added).”
Matter of Simmons (1988) iasb
Matter of Towns (1987) iasb “3 The Iowa legislature amended section 627.6 by increasing the maximum farm machinery exemption to $10,000.”
In re Clausen (1988) iand
In re Eby (1987) iand
— Iowa Code § 627.6(12) — 3 cases
Matter of Towns (1987) iasb “3 The Iowa legislature amended section 627.6 by increasing the maximum farm machinery exemption to $10,000.”
Matter of Van Pelt (1987) iasb
In re Peterman (1987) iand
— Iowa Code § 627.6(12)(a) — 3 cases
In Re Punke (1987) ianb “00 pursuant to the 1986 amendment to Iowa Code § 627.6 1 which took effect before the bankruptcy petition was filed but after the obli *939 gations to the affected creditors arose.”
Matter of Towns (1987) iasb “3 The Iowa legislature amended section 627.6 by increasing the maximum farm machinery exemption to $10,000.”
— Iowa Code § 627.6(14) — 4 cases
In re Arends (2014) ianb
— Iowa Code § 627.6(17) — 1 case
In Re Grethen (1981) ianb
— Iowa Code § 627.6(18) — 1 case
— Iowa Code § 627.6(1l)(a) — 2 cases
Matter of Van Pelt (1987) iasb
In re Erickson (1987) iand
— Iowa Code § 627.6(2) — 1 case
In Re McCabe (2002) ianb
— Iowa Code § 627.6(5) — 2 cases
In Re Bailey (2004) iasb “Iowa Code § 627.6 (9)(b) (emphasis added).”
Matter of Thompson (1984) iasb
— Iowa Code § 627.6(6) — 6 cases
In Re Punke (1987) ianb “00 pursuant to the 1986 amendment to Iowa Code § 627.6 1 which took effect before the bankruptcy petition was filed but after the obli *939 gations to the affected creditors arose.”
Matter of Layton (1990) iasb
In Re King (2011) ianb
— Iowa Code § 627.6(6)(f)(3) — 1 case
In Re Pepmeyer (2002) iand “Pepmeyer (hereinafter Debtor) appeals an adverse decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Iowa, in which the court held that Debtor’s individual retirement annuity is not an exempt asset under Iowa Code § 627.6 (8)(f). This appeal comes before…”
— Iowa Code § 627.6(7) — 3 cases
In re Bertram (1986) iand
In Re Pingel (1986) ianb
— Iowa Code § 627.6(8) — 6 cases
In Re Pepmeyer (2002) iand “Pepmeyer (hereinafter Debtor) appeals an adverse decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Iowa, in which the court held that Debtor’s individual retirement annuity is not an exempt asset under Iowa Code § 627.6 (8)(f). This appeal comes before…”
In Re Kemmerer (2000) ianb
In Re Wiley (1995) iand “kruptcy court for the Northern District of Iowa, the debtor asserts error in the bankruptcy court judge’s determination that an annuity in favor of the debtor as a settlement for a personal injury lawsuit was an asset of the estate and the bankruptcy court judge’s further…”
In Re Buchholz (1992) ianb
— Iowa Code § 627.6(8)(a) — 6 cases
Wilson v. Sergeant (In Re Wilson) (2004) ianb “” The Wilsons claimed the property was exempt under Iowa Code § 627.6 (8)(a), which exempts from bankruptcy proceedings any property that constitutes “[a] social security benefit, unemployment compensation, or any public assistance benefit.”
In Re Longstreet (2000) iasb “On November 29, 1999 they amended their Schedule C (Property Claimed as Exempt) to include a claim of exemption in their EIC under Iowa Code § 627.6 (8)(a). That section permits a debtor, who is an Iowa resident, to exempt from execution his or her rights in “[a] social security…”
In re Hatch (2014) iasb
Matter of Davis (1991) iasb “On schedule B-4 (property scheduled as exempt) the debtor cited Iowa Code § 627.6 (c) and § 642.21 and claimed $1,079 in exempt wages and tax refunds.”
In Re Wilson (2003) ianb
— Iowa Code § 627.6(8)(c) — 2 cases
In Re Buchholz (1992) ianb
— Iowa Code § 627.6(8)(e) — 14 cases
In Re Wiley (1995) iand “kruptcy court for the Northern District of Iowa, the debtor asserts error in the bankruptcy court judge’s determination that an annuity in favor of the debtor as a settlement for a personal injury lawsuit was an asset of the estate and the bankruptcy court judge’s further…”
Matter of Layton (1990) iasb
Matter of Gouker (1990) iasb
Matter of Carver (1990) iasb
In Re Pepmeyer (2002) iand “Pepmeyer (hereinafter Debtor) appeals an adverse decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Iowa, in which the court held that Debtor’s individual retirement annuity is not an exempt asset under Iowa Code § 627.6 (8)(f). This appeal comes before…”
— Iowa Code § 627.6(8)(f) — 5 cases
In Re Pepmeyer (2002) iand “Pepmeyer (hereinafter Debtor) appeals an adverse decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Iowa, in which the court held that Debtor’s individual retirement annuity is not an exempt asset under Iowa Code § 627.6 (8)(f). This appeal comes before…”
In Re Kemmerer (2000) ianb
Muff Corp. v. Paige (2022) iowactapp
Lucas Myhre Gonyier (2022) ianb
Karla K Kelly (2023) ianb
— Iowa Code § 627.6(8)(f)(1) — 1 case
Muff Corp. v. Paige (2022) iowactapp
— Iowa Code § 627.6(8)(f)(1)(d) — 1 case
Muff Corp. v. Paige (2022) iowactapp
— Iowa Code § 627.6(8)(f)(2) — 1 case
Muff Corp. v. Paige (2022) iowactapp
— Iowa Code § 627.6(8)(f)(3) — 1 case
In Re McCabe (2002) ianb
— Iowa Code § 627.6(9) — 8 cases
In Re Bailey (2004) iasb “Iowa Code § 627.6 (9)(b) (emphasis added).”
Matter of Pettit (1985) iasb “Any plan or contract exhibiting these characteristics should be exempt under Iowa Code § 627.6 (9)(e). Reviewing the Debtor’s Plan and based on the findings of fact, the court finds that: 1.”
Matter of Van Pelt (1987) iasb
Matter of Nehring (1988) iasb
Matter of Dettman (1988) iasb
— Iowa Code § 627.6(9)(a) — 1 case
In Re Bailey (2004) iasb “Iowa Code § 627.6 (9)(b) (emphasis added).”
— Iowa Code § 627.6(9)(b) — 4 cases
In Re Bailey (2004) iasb “Iowa Code § 627.6 (9)(b) (emphasis added).”
In Re Graettinger (1988) ianb
In re Erickson (1987) iand
In re Bierman (1991) iand
— Iowa Code § 627.6(9)(c) — 7 cases
Matter of Davis (1991) iasb “On schedule B-4 (property scheduled as exempt) the debtor cited Iowa Code § 627.6 (c) and § 642.21 and claimed $1,079 in exempt wages and tax refunds.”
Matter of Mattice (1987) iasb
Matter of Sexton (1992) iasb
Matter of Honomichl (1987) iasb
— Iowa Code § 627.6(9)(e) — 13 cases
In Re Flygstad (1986) ianb “This is clearly contemplated by the very nature of the exemptions in Iowa Code § 627.6 (9). An interest in future payments necessarily includes an interest in the present assets from which those payments will be made.”
In Re Gilbert (1985) ianb
Matter of Pettit (1985) iasb “Any plan or contract exhibiting these characteristics should be exempt under Iowa Code § 627.6 (9)(e). Reviewing the Debtor’s Plan and based on the findings of fact, the court finds that: 1.”
In Re Matthews (1986) ianb
— Iowa Code § 627.6(ll)(a) — 5 cases
In re Erickson (1987) iand
Matter of Van Pelt (1987) iasb
In Re Indvik (1990) ianb “As the statutory basis for the claim, they cited Iowa Code § 627.6 (11). The amended schedules, filed February 16, 1989, provided an itemized list of machinery and equipment showing the full value of each item and the value of the one-half interest claimed to be owned by Lowell…”
In re Clausen (1988) iand
In re Eby (1987) iand
— Iowa Code § 627.6(ll)(b) — 1 case
Matter of Simmons (1988) iasb
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.