Iowa Code
Iowa Code § 675.2 (2026)
Legislative purpose and intent
✓ Iowa Code 2026 (laws through the 2025 session)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The purpose and intent of this chapter is all of the following: 1. To restore the compelling governmental interest test and to guarantee its application in all cases where the free exercise of religion is substantially burdened by state action. 2. To provide a claim or defense to a person whose exercise of religion is substantially burdened by state action. 2024 Acts, ch 1003, §4, 7, 8
\nNotes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1971–2024 · leading case: State ex rel. Krupke v. Witkowski, 256 N.W.2d 216 (Iowa 1977).
State ex rel. Krupke v. Witkowski, 256 N.W.2d 216 (Iowa 1977). “Section 675.2, Code, 1971; Blanton v. Warn, 444 P.”
Jensen v. Voshell, 193 N.W.2d 86 (Iowa 1971). “Section 675.2, Code, 1971; Blanton v. Warn, 444 P.”
Bryant v. Schuster, 447 N.W.2d 566 (Iowa Ct. App. 1989). “We are not bound by these determinations, however. Id. I. Child Support Standards.”
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc. v. Kim Reynolds ex rel. State of Iowa, 9 N.W.3d 37 (Iowa 2024). “1003, § 4 (to be codified at Iowa Code § 675.2 (2025)). Finally, the majority’s decision raises concerns about the stability of other rights we consider fundamental.”
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc. v. Kim Reynolds ex rel. State of Iowa, 9 N.W.3d 37 (Iowa 2024). “1003, § 4 (to be codified at Iowa Code § 675.2 (2025)). Finally, the majority’s decision raises concerns about the stability of other rights we consider fundamental.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.