Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 85.2 (2026)

Public employees — chapter compulsory

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Where the state, county, municipal corporation, school corporation, area education agency, or city under any form of government is the employer, the provisions of this chapter for the payment of compensation and amount thereof for an injury sustained by an employee of such employer shall be exclusive, compulsory, and obligatory upon both employer and employee, except as otherwise provided in section 85.1. For the purposes of this chapter, elected and appointed officials shall be employees. [S13, §2477-m; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §1362; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §85.2]

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: Terri Rivera v. Woodward Resource Ctr. & State of Iowa, 830 N.W.2d 724 (Iowa 2013).
Terri Rivera v. Woodward Resource Ctr. & State of Iowa, 830 N.W.2d 724 (Iowa 2013). · cites it 4× “See Iowa Code § 85.2 (2013) (predecessor codified at Iowa Code § 2477–m(b) (Supp.”
Goebel v. City of Cedar Rapids, 267 N.W.2d 388 (Iowa 1978). · cites it 4× “See § 85.2, The Code. Rather, any benefits they receive under workers' compensation are to be offset against benefits receivable under chapter 97A.”
Decatur Cnty. v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 564 N.W.2d 394 (Iowa 1997). · cites it 2× “Iowa Code section 85.2 provides that, when a county is the employer, the provisions of the workers’ compensation law shall be “exclusive, compulsory, and obligatory upon both employer and employee.”
John Larson v. Chad Holmes (Iowa Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 23× “14A(3),” that workers’ compensation was the only remedy available to Larson as a public employee under Iowa Code section 85.2, and that coemployee gross negligence claims are not covered “under the State’s limited waiver of its sovereign immunity” under the ITCA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.