green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Knapp
App. 2011) (unpublished opinion) (two punches to face knocking out victim's tooth sufficient to support jury verdict based on great bodily harm); State v. Vessels, No. 96,421, 2008 WL 1847374, at *4 (Kan.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Williams
App. 2d 500, 503-04 , 947 P.2d 454 (1997) (holding that bullet wound which required hip bone and hip socket to be replaced constituted great bodily harm as matter of law); but cf. State v. Brice, 276 Kan. 758, 773-74 , 80 P.3d 1113 (2003) (bullet that goes through body without hitting any vital organs may or may not cause great bodily harm); State v. Vessels, No. 96,421, 2008 WL 1847374, at *5 (Kan.
STATE
v.
VESSELS.
v.
VESSELS.
96421.
Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Apr 18, 2008.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Decision without published opinion. Reversed and remanded with directions.