K.S.A. » Chapter 17
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 17-7631 (2026)

Repealed

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

17-7631.

History: L. 1990, ch. 80, § 31; L. 1991, ch. 76, § 27; Repealed, L. 1999, ch. 119, § 87; January 1, 2000.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2000–2011 · leading case: Halley v. Barnabe, 24 P.3d 140 (Kan. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Halley v. Barnabe, 24 P.3d 140 (Kan. 2001). · cites it 2× “Other arguments Bill Creach’s argument is misplaced that the provisions of K.S.A. 17-7631 show the legislature did not intend for derivative suits to be available against members or managers of a limited liability company.”
Matjasich v. State of Kansas Dep't of Human Resources, 21 P.3d 985 (Kan. 2001). “K.S.A. 17-7631. However, where a Hmited HabiHty company is organized under the laws of another jurisdiction, K.”
Canyon Creek Dev., LLC v. Fox, 263 P.3d 799 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “However, Creach argued that the provisions of K.S.A. 17-7631 show a legislative intent not to permit derivative suits to be available against members or managers of a limited liability company.”
Rebarchek v. Farmers Coop. Elevator & Mercantile Ass'n, 13 P.3d 17 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “See K.S.A. 17-7631. We agree with Rebarchek that these last three arguments are completely ineffectual.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.