K.S.A. » Chapter 19

K.S.A. § 19-2934a

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

19-2934a.

History: L. 1961, ch. 156, § 2; Repealed, L. 1991, ch. 56, § 28; January 1, 1992.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Granting of variance beyond authority of board; no evidence of, "unnecessary hardship"; variance inconsistent with zoning order. Stice v. Gribben-Allen Motors, Inc., 216 Kan. 744, 534 P.2d 1267.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Hacker v. Sedgwick County
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hacker v. Sedgwick County (2012) kanctapp “On appeal, our Supreme Court considered whether there was substantial evidence to support the board’s finding that strict application of the zoning regulations would cause unnecessary hardship on the defendant, as required under K.”
— K.S.A. § 19-2934a(b)(3) — 1 case
Hacker v. Sedgwick County (2012) kanctapp “On appeal, our Supreme Court considered whether there was substantial evidence to support the board’s finding that strict application of the zoning regulations would cause unnecessary hardship on the defendant, as required under K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.