K.S.A. § 21-3428

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-3428.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3428; L. 1992, ch. 298, § 18; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 42; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1994–2014 · leading case: State v. Neufeld
State v. Neufeld (1996) kan · cites it 10× “Further, Neufeld alleged that the blackmail statute (K.S.A. 21-3428) was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad and violated the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and § 11 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights.”
State v. Brooks (2011) kanctapp · cites it 4× “" In pertinent part, K.S.A. 21-3428 provides: "Blackmail is gaining or attempting to gain anything of value or compelling another to act against such person's will, by threatening to communicate accusations or statements about any person that would subject such person or any…”
State v. Brooks (2014) kan “Simply stated, while these may be the actions of someone who succumbed to conspiracy or blackmail, they are not the actions of someone immobilized or 'paralyzed by fear.”
State v. Blockman (1994) kan · cites it 2× “While the new crime of blackmail (K.S.A. 21-3428) encompasses much of what was the crime of extortion, aspects of the common-law crime of extortion remain under K.”
In Re Pyle (2004) kan “” In a footnote to the final hearing report, the panel opined that Pyle also may have committed blackmail, pursuant to K.S.A. 21-3428. The panel’s conclusion on Pyle’s motives is adequately supported by the evidence and the panel’s judgment on his credibility.”
State v. Braun (2012) kanctapp · cites it 2× “So with these rules in mind, let’s look at the Kansas blackmail statute as it existed when Braun is alleged to have committed this crime: K.S.A. 21-3428. We have added some bracketed numbers to show the statute’s structure.”
State v. Brooks (2011) kan · cites it 2× “" In pertinent part, K.S.A. 21-3428 provides: "Blackmail is gaining or attempting to gain anything of value or compelling another to act against such person's will, by threatening to communicate accusations or statements about any person that would subject such person or any…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.