K.S.A. » Chapter 21

K.S.A. § 21-3525

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-3525.

History: L. 1976, ch. 162, § 1; L. 1983, ch. 109, § 15; L. 1991, ch. 87, § 1; L. 1992, ch. 298, § 32; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 53; L. 2005, ch. 114, § 1; L. 2009, ch. 70, § 2; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 38 cases, 1984–2015 · leading case: State v. Atkinson
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Atkinson (2003) kan · cites it 12× “On direct appeal, Atkinson argues the trial court erred in applying the Kansas rape shield statute, K.S.A. 21-3525, in a manner which violated his rights under the Due Process and Confrontation Clauses of the United States and Kansas Constitutions.”
State v. McQuillen (1984) kan · cites it 14× “60-447a (Weeks), now K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 21-3525, commonly referred to as the rape shield statute.”
State v. Bello (2009) kan · cites it 8× “Bello contends that the district court erred by excluding evidence on the basis of noncompliance with the time constraints of K.S.A. 21-3525; that the State failed to charge and the district court failed to instruct on an essential element of the crimes, violating his…”
State v. Holman (2012) kan · cites it 7× “On the other hand, he complains of the trial court’s refusal to admit evidence of the prior sexual conduct of the complaining witness under the Kansas rape shield statute, K.S.A. 21-3525, and evidence of the prior sexual conduct of her sister.”
State v. Gilliland (2012) kan · cites it 5× “Issue 3: Exclusion of Evidence under Rape Shield Statute Next, Gilliland argues that die trial court erred by excluding evidence under K.S.A. 21-3525, commonly known as the Kansas rape shield statute.”
State v. Magallanez (2010) kan · cites it 4× “The State objected that the letter was barred by the rape shield statute, K.S.A. 21-3525. The district judge agreed, saying: “[T]he fact that [J.”
State v. Berriozabal (2010) kan · cites it 3× “’s prior sexual behavior under the Kansas rape shield statute, K.S.A. 21-3525. Specifically, Berriozabal mentioned the alleged incident between M.”
State v. King (2014) kan · cites it 4× “” K.S.A. 21-3525, which limits evidence of a sex crime victim’s previous sexual conduct with any person including the defendant, is known as the rape shield statute.”
State v. Redford (1988) kan · cites it 4× “The next issue is whether the trial court incorrectly excluded evidence of Donna’s prior sexual conduct with Redford pursuant to K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 21-3525, which provides as follows: “(1) The provisions of this section shall apply only in a prosecution for: (a) Rape, as defined…”
State v. Lavery (1993) kanctapp · cites it 6× “Lavery argues that the Forth evidence was highly probative because it explained an alternate source of K.”
State v. Arrington (1992) kan · cites it 4× “On the day before trial, the State filed a motion in limine to preclude the defendant from introducing evidence of the victims’ previous sexual conduct, pursuant to K.S.A. 21-3525. In support of the motion, the State noted that the defendant had failed to make a written motion…”
State v. Bressman (1984) kan · cites it 2× “60-447[a] [Weeks], subsequently transferred to K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 21-3525). K.S.A. 1983 Supp.”
Show all 38 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 21-3525(1) — 1 case
State v. Chandler (1992) kanctapp
— K.S.A. § 21-3525(1)(d) — 1 case
State v. Lavery (1993) kanctapp “Lavery argues that the Forth evidence was highly probative because it explained an alternate source of K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3525(2) — 7 cases
State v. Walker (1992) kan
State v. Gonzales (1989) kan
State v. Carmichael (1986) kan
State v. Bressman (1984) kan “60-447[a] [Weeks], subsequently transferred to K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 21-3525). K.S.A. 1983 Supp.”
State v. Walker (1993) kan
— K.S.A. § 21-3525(3) — 3 cases
State v. McQuillen (1984) kan “60-447a (Weeks), now K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 21-3525, commonly referred to as the rape shield statute.”
State v. Beans (1990) kan
State v. Chandler (1992) kanctapp
— K.S.A. § 21-3525(a) — 1 case
State v. King (2014) kan “” K.S.A. 21-3525, which limits evidence of a sex crime victim’s previous sexual conduct with any person including the defendant, is known as the rape shield statute.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3525(a)(5) — 1 case
State v. Gilliland (2012) kan “Issue 3: Exclusion of Evidence under Rape Shield Statute Next, Gilliland argues that die trial court erred by excluding evidence under K.S.A. 21-3525, commonly known as the Kansas rape shield statute.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3525(b) — 14 cases
State v. Berriozabal (2010) kan “’s prior sexual behavior under the Kansas rape shield statute, K.S.A. 21-3525. Specifically, Berriozabal mentioned the alleged incident between M.”
State v. Gilliland (2012) kan “Issue 3: Exclusion of Evidence under Rape Shield Statute Next, Gilliland argues that die trial court erred by excluding evidence under K.S.A. 21-3525, commonly known as the Kansas rape shield statute.”
State v. Holman (2012) kan “On the other hand, he complains of the trial court’s refusal to admit evidence of the prior sexual conduct of the complaining witness under the Kansas rape shield statute, K.S.A. 21-3525, and evidence of the prior sexual conduct of her sister.”
State v. King (2014) kan “” K.S.A. 21-3525, which limits evidence of a sex crime victim’s previous sexual conduct with any person including the defendant, is known as the rape shield statute.”
State v. Perez (1999) kanctapp
— K.S.A. § 21-3525(c) — 1 case
State v. Magallanez (2010) kan “The State objected that the letter was barred by the rape shield statute, K.S.A. 21-3525. The district judge agreed, saying: “[T]he fact that [J.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.