K.S.A. » Chapter 21

K.S.A. § 21-4001

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4001.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4001; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 184; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 132; L. 2000, ch. 181, § 7; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1973–2012 · leading case: State v. Roudybush
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Roudybush (1984) kan · cites it 17× “Before trial, defendant moved to suppress his intercepted oral communications with Brazzle, the search warrant and all evidence seized pursuant thereto, on the ground the radio transmission and interception of defendant’s oral communications were unlawful and in violation of…”
State v. Gilliland (2012) kan · cites it 7× “In Gilliland’s motion to suppress, he argued the interception of these telephone calls violated his reasonable expectation of privacy in violation of two criminal statutes, K.”
Peoples v. CCA Detention Centers (2005) ca10 · cites it 2× “See Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-4001 (eavesdropping); Kan.”
State v. Martin (1983) kan · cites it 6× “Coffman, District Judge, Assigned: Roland Martin was acquitted on charges of eavesdropping pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4001. The State of Kansas appeals.”
Luella Holmes and Elizabeth Y. Thomas v. Joan Finney, E. Dean Eikenberry, Harrasetta H. Kinney, William B. McCormick and (1980) ca10 “See K.S.A. 21-4001 (Kansas eavesdropping statute); State v.”
State v. Farha (1975) kan “An ex parte order authorizing eavesdropping, as defined in K.S.A. 1969 Supp. 21-4001, may be issued by any justice of the supreme court or by any district judge as herein provided.”
State v. Bowman National Security Agency, Inc. (1982) kan · cites it 13× “The defendants were charged with eavesdropping (K.S.A. 21-4001 [ 1][c]) and also breach of privacy (K.”
In Re Olander (1973) kan “The statute reads in part: "An ex parte order authorizing eavesdropping, as defined in K.S.A. 1969 Supp. 21-4001, may be issued by any justice of the supreme court or by any district judge as herein provided.”
State v. Liebau (2003) kanctapp “21-4001 provides: “(a) Eavesdropping is knowingly and without lawful authority: “(1) Entering into a private place with intent to listen surreptitiously to private conversations or to observe the personal conduct of any other person or persons therein; “(b) A ‘private place’…”
Thomas v. CITY OF BAXTER SPRINGS, KAN. (2005) ksd “(K.S.A.21-4001) Criminal defamation is a Class A violation Ordinance No.”
How v. City of Baxter Springs, Kan. (2005) ksd “(K.S.A.21-4001) Criminal defamation is a Class A violation Ordinance No.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4001(1) — 1 case
State v. Bowman National Security Agency, Inc. (1982) kan “The defendants were charged with eavesdropping (K.S.A. 21-4001 [ 1][c]) and also breach of privacy (K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4001(a)(3) — 1 case
State v. Gilliland (2012) kan “In Gilliland’s motion to suppress, he argued the interception of these telephone calls violated his reasonable expectation of privacy in violation of two criminal statutes, K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4001(l)(a) — 2 cases
State v. Roudybush (1984) kan “Before trial, defendant moved to suppress his intercepted oral communications with Brazzle, the search warrant and all evidence seized pursuant thereto, on the ground the radio transmission and interception of defendant’s oral communications were unlawful and in violation of…”
State v. Martin (1983) kan “Coffman, District Judge, Assigned: Roland Martin was acquitted on charges of eavesdropping pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4001. The State of Kansas appeals.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4001(l)(b) — 1 case
State v. Roudybush (1984) kan “Before trial, defendant moved to suppress his intercepted oral communications with Brazzle, the search warrant and all evidence seized pursuant thereto, on the ground the radio transmission and interception of defendant’s oral communications were unlawful and in violation of…”
— K.S.A. § 21-4001(l)(c) — 2 cases
State v. Roudybush (1984) kan “Before trial, defendant moved to suppress his intercepted oral communications with Brazzle, the search warrant and all evidence seized pursuant thereto, on the ground the radio transmission and interception of defendant’s oral communications were unlawful and in violation of…”
State v. Bowman National Security Agency, Inc. (1982) kan “The defendants were charged with eavesdropping (K.S.A. 21-4001 [ 1][c]) and also breach of privacy (K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4001(l)(fe) — 1 case
State v. Roudybush (1984) kan “Before trial, defendant moved to suppress his intercepted oral communications with Brazzle, the search warrant and all evidence seized pursuant thereto, on the ground the radio transmission and interception of defendant’s oral communications were unlawful and in violation of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.