K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4002 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4002.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4002; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 185; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 133; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1982–2012 · leading case: State v. Brooks, 265 P.3d 1175 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Brooks, 265 P.3d 1175 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 26× “In pertinent part, K.S.A. 21-4002 provides: "(a) Breach of privacy is knowingly and without lawful authority: (1) Intercepting, without the consent of the sender or receiver, a message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of private communication; or .”
State v. Gilliland, 276 P.3d 165 (Kan. 2012). · cites it 7× “In Gilliland’s motion to suppress, he argued the interception of these telephone calls violated his reasonable expectation of privacy in violation of two criminal statutes, K.”
Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (2001). · cites it 2× “2 (1994); Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-4002 (1995); Ky. Rev.”
State v. Roudybush, 686 P.2d 100 (Kan. 1984). · cites it 6× “21-4001 defines the crime of eavesdropping and K.S.A. 21-4002 defines the crime of breach of privacy.”
Peoples v. CCA Det. Centers, 422 F.3d 1090 (10th Cir. 2005). “See Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-4001 (eavesdropping); Kan.”
MGM Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Ins., 855 P.2d 77 (Kan. 1993). · cites it 2× “Liberty Mutual contends there was no coverage as: (1) the evidence is uncontroverted that there was no publication or utterance of the intercepted telephone conversations and hence the employees’ claims were not included within the policy personal injury definitions; and (2)…”
Boehner, John A. v. McDermott, James A., 191 F.3d 463 (D.C. Cir. 1999). “309 (West); Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-4002 (1996); Ky.Rev.”
State v. Bowman Nat'l Sec. Agency, Inc., 647 P.2d 1288 (Kan. 1982). · cites it 5× “21-4001 [ 1][c]) and also breach of privacy (K.S.A. 21-4002). Those statutes provide in part as follows: “21-4001.”
State v. Brooks, 263 P.3d 161 (Kan. 2011). · cites it 13× “In pertinent part, K.S.A. 21-4002 provides: "(a) Breach of privacy is knowingly and without lawful authority: (1) Intercepting, without the consent of the sender or receiver, a message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of private communication; or .”
— K.S.A. § 21-4002(a) — 2 cases
State v. Brooks, 265 P.3d 1175 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “In pertinent part, K.S.A. 21-4002 provides: "(a) Breach of privacy is knowingly and without lawful authority: (1) Intercepting, without the consent of the sender or receiver, a message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of private communication; or .”
State v. Brooks, 263 P.3d 161 (Kan. 2011). “In pertinent part, K.S.A. 21-4002 provides: "(a) Breach of privacy is knowingly and without lawful authority: (1) Intercepting, without the consent of the sender or receiver, a message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of private communication; or .”
— K.S.A. § 21-4002(a)(1) — 3 cases
State v. Gilliland, 276 P.3d 165 (Kan. 2012). “In Gilliland’s motion to suppress, he argued the interception of these telephone calls violated his reasonable expectation of privacy in violation of two criminal statutes, K.”
State v. Brooks, 265 P.3d 1175 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “In pertinent part, K.S.A. 21-4002 provides: "(a) Breach of privacy is knowingly and without lawful authority: (1) Intercepting, without the consent of the sender or receiver, a message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of private communication; or .”
State v. Brooks, 263 P.3d 161 (Kan. 2011). “In pertinent part, K.S.A. 21-4002 provides: "(a) Breach of privacy is knowingly and without lawful authority: (1) Intercepting, without the consent of the sender or receiver, a message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of private communication; or .”
— K.S.A. § 21-4002(a)(l) — 2 cases
State v. Gilliland, 276 P.3d 165 (Kan. 2012). “In Gilliland’s motion to suppress, he argued the interception of these telephone calls violated his reasonable expectation of privacy in violation of two criminal statutes, K.”
State v. Brooks, 265 P.3d 1175 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “In pertinent part, K.S.A. 21-4002 provides: "(a) Breach of privacy is knowingly and without lawful authority: (1) Intercepting, without the consent of the sender or receiver, a message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of private communication; or .”
— K.S.A. § 21-4002(l)(a) — 2 cases
State v. Roudybush, 686 P.2d 100 (Kan. 1984). “21-4001 defines the crime of eavesdropping and K.S.A. 21-4002 defines the crime of breach of privacy.”
State v. Bowman Nat'l Sec. Agency, Inc., 647 P.2d 1288 (Kan. 1982). “21-4001 [ 1][c]) and also breach of privacy (K.S.A. 21-4002). Those statutes provide in part as follows: “21-4001.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4002(l)(c) — 1 case
State v. Roudybush, 686 P.2d 100 (Kan. 1984). “21-4001 defines the crime of eavesdropping and K.S.A. 21-4002 defines the crime of breach of privacy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.