K.S.A. » Chapter 21

K.S.A. § 21-4302

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4302.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4302; L. 1971, ch. 111, § 1; L. 1977, ch. 341, § 1; L. 1987, ch. 292, § 23; L. 1987, ch. 112, § 35; L. 1994, ch. 257, § 1; L. 1996, ch. 256, § 11; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases, 1972–2011 · leading case: State v. Schlein
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Schlein (1993) kan · cites it 36× “21-4303 provide: "`Under subsection (b) it must be proved that (1) the offender entered or remained in a gambling place, i.e., a structure, one of whose principal uses is for making and settling bets, receiving, holding, recording or forwarding bets or offers to bet, conduct…”
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Finney (1994) kan · cites it 16× “What effect do the provisions in the Kansas Criminal Code relative to gambling (K.S.A. 21-4302 through 21-4308) have on the issues herein, with particular reference to Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe v.”
State v. Nelson (1972) kan · cites it 7× “Following a trial to the court the district court ruled as a matter of law that the conduct of the defendants as set forth in the informations was not a violation of K.S.A. 1971 Supp. 21-4307 and 21-4303 in view of K.”
Burdett v. Harrah's Kansas Casino Corp. (2003) ksd · cites it 6× “In 1995, the Kansas legislature approved, and former Governor Bill Graves signed, tribal-state gaming compacts for each of the four tribes.”
Games Management, Inc. v. Owens (1983) kan · cites it 4× “: This is a declaratory judgment action to obtain construction of K.S.A. 21-4302(4). The facts from which this controversy arose disclose appellee Games Management, Inc.”
Dissmeyer v. State (2011) kan · cites it 5× “The district court elected to incorporate the definition of "gambling device" from K.S.A. 21-4302(d). K.S.A. 21-4307 makes possession of a gambling device illegal.”
State v. Durst (1984) kan · cites it 2× “” Gambling devices are defined in K.S.A. 21-4302(4) as: “A ‘gambling device’ is a contrivance which for a consideration affords the player an opportunity to obtain something of value, the award of which is determined by chance, or any token, chip, paper, receipt or other…”
Lambeth v. Levens (1985) kan · cites it 2× “” Lottery is defined in K.S.A. 21-4302(2) as “an enterprise wherein for a consideration the participants are given an opportunity to win a prize, the award of which is determined by chance.”
State ex rel. Stephan v. Parrish (1994) kan · cites it 2× “3 of the Kansas Constitution has provided: “Lotteries and the sale of lottery tickets are forever prohibited.”
THREE KINGS HOLDINGS, LLC v. Six (2011) kanctapp · cites it 4× “(Three Kings) appeals the district court's denial of its petition seeking a declaration that Kandu Challenge is not an illegal lottery under K.S.A. 21-4302. We affirm. Kandu Challenge is a card game invented by Curtis Shawn Riley, Kurt McPhail, and Shane McCullough.”
State v. Thirty-Six (36) Pinball MacHines (1977) kan “K.S.A. 21-4302 sets forth gambling definitions, among which we find: “(4) A ‘gambling device’ is a contrivance which for a consideration affords the player an opportunity to obtain something of value, the award of which is determined by chance, or any token, chip, paper, receipt…”
State v. Schlein (1992) kanctapp · cites it 12× “The Judicial Council notes following K.S.A. 21-4302 state the statutes of Wisconsin, New Mexico, and Colorado were consulted in preparing that section, K.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 21-4302(1) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Finney (1994) kan “What effect do the provisions in the Kansas Criminal Code relative to gambling (K.S.A. 21-4302 through 21-4308) have on the issues herein, with particular reference to Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe v.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4302(2) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Finney (1994) kan “What effect do the provisions in the Kansas Criminal Code relative to gambling (K.S.A. 21-4302 through 21-4308) have on the issues herein, with particular reference to Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe v.”
Lambeth v. Levens (1985) kan “” Lottery is defined in K.S.A. 21-4302(2) as “an enterprise wherein for a consideration the participants are given an opportunity to win a prize, the award of which is determined by chance.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4302(3) — 1 case
Lambeth v. Levens (1985) kan “” Lottery is defined in K.S.A. 21-4302(2) as “an enterprise wherein for a consideration the participants are given an opportunity to win a prize, the award of which is determined by chance.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4302(3)(b) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Finney (1994) kan “What effect do the provisions in the Kansas Criminal Code relative to gambling (K.S.A. 21-4302 through 21-4308) have on the issues herein, with particular reference to Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe v.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4302(4) — 2 cases
Games Management, Inc. v. Owens (1983) kan “: This is a declaratory judgment action to obtain construction of K.S.A. 21-4302(4). The facts from which this controversy arose disclose appellee Games Management, Inc.”
State v. Durst (1984) kan “” Gambling devices are defined in K.S.A. 21-4302(4) as: “A ‘gambling device’ is a contrivance which for a consideration affords the player an opportunity to obtain something of value, the award of which is determined by chance, or any token, chip, paper, receipt or other…”
— K.S.A. § 21-4302(5) — 2 cases
State v. Schlein (1993) kan “21-4303 provide: "`Under subsection (b) it must be proved that (1) the offender entered or remained in a gambling place, i.e., a structure, one of whose principal uses is for making and settling bets, receiving, holding, recording or forwarding bets or offers to bet, conduct…”
State v. Schlein (1992) kanctapp “The Judicial Council notes following K.S.A. 21-4302 state the statutes of Wisconsin, New Mexico, and Colorado were consulted in preparing that section, K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4302(a)(7) — 1 case
Burdett v. Harrah's Kansas Casino Corp. (2003) ksd “In 1995, the Kansas legislature approved, and former Governor Bill Graves signed, tribal-state gaming compacts for each of the four tribes.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4302(b) — 2 cases
THREE KINGS HOLDINGS, LLC v. Six (2011) kanctapp “(Three Kings) appeals the district court's denial of its petition seeking a declaration that Kandu Challenge is not an illegal lottery under K.S.A. 21-4302. We affirm. Kandu Challenge is a card game invented by Curtis Shawn Riley, Kurt McPhail, and Shane McCullough.”
Three Kings Holdings, L.L.C. v. Six (2011) kanctapp
— K.S.A. § 21-4302(d) — 1 case
Dissmeyer v. State (2011) kan “The district court elected to incorporate the definition of "gambling device" from K.S.A. 21-4302(d). K.S.A. 21-4307 makes possession of a gambling device illegal.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4302(d)(7)(D) — 1 case
Burdett v. Harrah's Kansas Casino Corp. (2003) ksd “In 1995, the Kansas legislature approved, and former Governor Bill Graves signed, tribal-state gaming compacts for each of the four tribes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.