Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 21-4611 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
21-4611.
History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4611; L. 1977, ch. 118, § 1; L. 1978, ch. 120, § 10; L. 1986, ch. 123, § 12; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 245; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 185; L. 1996, ch. 258, § 4; L. 2000, ch. 182, § 6; L. 2009, ch. 132, § 9; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 54
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: State v. Gordon, 66 P.3d 903 (Kan. 2003).
State v. Gordon, 66 P.3d 903 (Kan. 2003). “The Court of Appeals, interpreting provisions of K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4611 and K.S.A. 2002 Supp.”
State v. Hambright, 447 P.3d 972 (Kan. 2019). “3d 22 (2009) ("[T]his court has recognized that a deviation from the recommended term of subsection [c][1] of K.S.A. 21-4611 is considered a departure.”
State v. Schad, 206 P.3d 22 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “) *825 Subsections (c)(7) and (c)(8) of K.S.A. 21-4611 are inapplicable to the present case as they relate to a conviction for nonsupport of a child and the modification and extension of an offender s period of supervision, respectively.”
State v. Alonzo, 297 P.3d 300 (Kan. 2013). “21-4705 and K.S.A. 21-4611(c)(3). He argued this meant the district court’s jurisdiction over him ended when his legal term of probation ended on July 14, 2006.”
State v. Favela, 911 P.2d 792 (Kan. 1996). ““(d) If the sentencing judge imposes a nonprison sentence as a dispositional-departure from -the guidelines, the recommended duration shall be as provided in subsection (c) of K.S.A. 21-4611 and amendments thereto.” (Emphasis added.”
State v. Herron, 335 P.3d 1211 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). “3d 903 (2003) (concluding that probation could be extended without a hearing for unpaid restitution, applying K.S.A. 21-4611[c][7]). By contrast, if Herron 9 attempted to pay the restitution she owed during her 18-month probation, she would be paying $381.”
State v. Purdy, 89 P.3d 591 (Kan. 2004). “Jones argued that the district court’s extension of his probation did not meet the requirements of K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4611(c)(5) because the court’s order did not set forth with particularity the reasons for extending probation.”
State v. Ferguson, 23 P.3d 891 (Kan. 2001). “On May 25, 2000, an amendment to K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 21-4611 took effect. L.”
State v. Boswell, 37 P.3d 40 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4611(d); K.S.A. 2000 Supp.”
State v. Whitesell, 33 P.3d 865 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “182, § 6 (codified at K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4611 and referenced as such herein) altered the sentencing scheme in effect when Whitesell committed the crime of conviction.”
State v. McIntyre, 46 P.3d 1212 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). “McIntyre requested that he be allowed to enter a residential treatment program and that, pursuant to K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4611(c)(3), his probation be reinstated for 12 months.”
State v. Cisneros, 147 P.3d 880 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “Such extensions may be made for a maximum period of five years or the maximum period of the prison sentence that could be imposed, whichever is longer, inclusive of the original supervision term.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(1) — 4 cases
State v. Stough, 41 P.3d 281 (Kan. 2002).
State v. Williams, 884 P.2d 743 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994).
State v. Farmer, 824 P.2d 998 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992).
State v. Trevitt (Kan. Ct. App. 2020).
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(2) — 1 case
State v. Wells, 861 P.2d 828 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993).
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(c) — 17 cases
State v. Hambright, 447 P.3d 972 (Kan. 2019). “3d 22 (2009) ("[T]his court has recognized that a deviation from the recommended term of subsection [c][1] of K.S.A. 21-4611 is considered a departure.”
State v. Gordon, 66 P.3d 903 (Kan. 2003). “The Court of Appeals, interpreting provisions of K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4611 and K.S.A. 2002 Supp.”
State v. Ferguson, 23 P.3d 891 (Kan. 2001). “On May 25, 2000, an amendment to K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 21-4611 took effect. L.”
State v. Dillard, 890 P.2d 1248 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
State v. Hambright, 388 P.3d 613 (Kan. Ct. App. 2017).
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(c)(1) — 1 case
State v. Schad, 206 P.3d 22 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “) *825 Subsections (c)(7) and (c)(8) of K.S.A. 21-4611 are inapplicable to the present case as they relate to a conviction for nonsupport of a child and the modification and extension of an offender s period of supervision, respectively.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(c)(1)(A) — 2 cases
State v. Favela, 911 P.2d 792 (Kan. 1996). ““(d) If the sentencing judge imposes a nonprison sentence as a dispositional-departure from -the guidelines, the recommended duration shall be as provided in subsection (c) of K.S.A. 21-4611 and amendments thereto.” (Emphasis added.”
State v. Schad, 206 P.3d 22 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “) *825 Subsections (c)(7) and (c)(8) of K.S.A. 21-4611 are inapplicable to the present case as they relate to a conviction for nonsupport of a child and the modification and extension of an offender s period of supervision, respectively.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(c)(1)(B) — 2 cases
State v. Hambright, 447 P.3d 972 (Kan. 2019). “3d 22 (2009) ("[T]his court has recognized that a deviation from the recommended term of subsection [c][1] of K.S.A. 21-4611 is considered a departure.”
State v. Huff, 71 P.3d 1185 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(c)(3) — 13 cases
State v. Boswell, 37 P.3d 40 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4611(d); K.S.A. 2000 Supp.”
State v. Gordon, 66 P.3d 903 (Kan. 2003). “The Court of Appeals, interpreting provisions of K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4611 and K.S.A. 2002 Supp.”
State v. Ferguson, 23 P.3d 891 (Kan. 2001). “On May 25, 2000, an amendment to K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 21-4611 took effect. L.”
State v. McIntyre, 46 P.3d 1212 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). “McIntyre requested that he be allowed to enter a residential treatment program and that, pursuant to K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4611(c)(3), his probation be reinstated for 12 months.”
State v. Alonzo, 297 P.3d 300 (Kan. 2013). “21-4705 and K.S.A. 21-4611(c)(3). He argued this meant the district court’s jurisdiction over him ended when his legal term of probation ended on July 14, 2006.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(c)(4) — 4 cases
State v. Gordon, 66 P.3d 903 (Kan. 2003). “The Court of Appeals, interpreting provisions of K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4611 and K.S.A. 2002 Supp.”
State v. Cooper, 977 P.2d 960 (Kan. 1999).
State v. Hall, 49 P.3d 19 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. Purdy, 77 P.3d 514 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(c)(5) — 19 cases
State v. Alonzo, 297 P.3d 300 (Kan. 2013). “21-4705 and K.S.A. 21-4611(c)(3). He argued this meant the district court’s jurisdiction over him ended when his legal term of probation ended on July 14, 2006.”
State v. Purdy, 89 P.3d 591 (Kan. 2004). “Jones argued that the district court’s extension of his probation did not meet the requirements of K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4611(c)(5) because the court’s order did not set forth with particularity the reasons for extending probation.”
State v. Schad, 206 P.3d 22 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “) *825 Subsections (c)(7) and (c)(8) of K.S.A. 21-4611 are inapplicable to the present case as they relate to a conviction for nonsupport of a child and the modification and extension of an offender s period of supervision, respectively.”
State v. McIntyre, 46 P.3d 1212 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). “McIntyre requested that he be allowed to enter a residential treatment program and that, pursuant to K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4611(c)(3), his probation be reinstated for 12 months.”
State v. Whitesell, 33 P.3d 865 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “182, § 6 (codified at K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4611 and referenced as such herein) altered the sentencing scheme in effect when Whitesell committed the crime of conviction.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(c)(6) — 5 cases
State v. Gordon, 66 P.3d 903 (Kan. 2003). “The Court of Appeals, interpreting provisions of K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4611 and K.S.A. 2002 Supp.”
State v. Schad, 206 P.3d 22 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “) *825 Subsections (c)(7) and (c)(8) of K.S.A. 21-4611 are inapplicable to the present case as they relate to a conviction for nonsupport of a child and the modification and extension of an offender s period of supervision, respectively.”
State v. McIntyre, 46 P.3d 1212 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). “McIntyre requested that he be allowed to enter a residential treatment program and that, pursuant to K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4611(c)(3), his probation be reinstated for 12 months.”
State v. Hall, 49 P.3d 19 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. Huff, 71 P.3d 1185 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(c)(7) — 7 cases
State v. Gordon, 66 P.3d 903 (Kan. 2003). “The Court of Appeals, interpreting provisions of K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4611 and K.S.A. 2002 Supp.”
State v. Herron, 335 P.3d 1211 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). “3d 903 (2003) (concluding that probation could be extended without a hearing for unpaid restitution, applying K.S.A. 21-4611[c][7]). By contrast, if Herron 9 attempted to pay the restitution she owed during her 18-month probation, she would be paying $381.”
State v. Hoffman, 246 P.3d 992 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
State v. McDonald, 32 P.3d 1167 (Kan. 2001).
State v. Ferguson, 23 P.3d 891 (Kan. 2001). “On May 25, 2000, an amendment to K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 21-4611 took effect. L.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(c)(8) — 13 cases
State v. Gordon, 66 P.3d 903 (Kan. 2003). “The Court of Appeals, interpreting provisions of K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4611 and K.S.A. 2002 Supp.”
State v. Cisneros, 147 P.3d 880 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “Such extensions may be made for a maximum period of five years or the maximum period of the prison sentence that could be imposed, whichever is longer, inclusive of the original supervision term.”
State v. Grossman, 248 P.3d 776 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Hoffman, 246 P.3d 992 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Freeman, 93 P.3d 1223 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(c)(l) — 2 cases
State v. Whitesell, 13 P.3d 887 (Kan. 2000).
State v. Purdy, 89 P.3d 591 (Kan. 2004). “Jones argued that the district court’s extension of his probation did not meet the requirements of K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4611(c)(5) because the court’s order did not set forth with particularity the reasons for extending probation.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(c)(l)(A) — 1 case
State v. Bost, 903 P.2d 160 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(c)(l)(B) — 1 case
State v. Whitesell, 33 P.3d 865 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “182, § 6 (codified at K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4611 and referenced as such herein) altered the sentencing scheme in effect when Whitesell committed the crime of conviction.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(d) — 6 cases
State v. Gordon, 66 P.3d 903 (Kan. 2003). “The Court of Appeals, interpreting provisions of K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4611 and K.S.A. 2002 Supp.”
State v. Boswell, 37 P.3d 40 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4611(d); K.S.A. 2000 Supp.”
State v. Whitesell, 33 P.3d 865 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “182, § 6 (codified at K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4611 and referenced as such herein) altered the sentencing scheme in effect when Whitesell committed the crime of conviction.”
State v. Ferguson, 23 P.3d 891 (Kan. 2001). “On May 25, 2000, an amendment to K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 21-4611 took effect. L.”
State v. Purdy, 89 P.3d 591 (Kan. 2004). “Jones argued that the district court’s extension of his probation did not meet the requirements of K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4611(c)(5) because the court’s order did not set forth with particularity the reasons for extending probation.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4611(e)(4) — 1 case
State v. McDonald, 32 P.3d 1167 (Kan. 2001).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.