K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4702 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4702.

History: L. 1992, ch. 239, § 2; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2022 · leading case: State v. Theurer, 337 P.3d 725 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Theurer, 337 P.3d 725 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “The statute still began this way in 1992 when the KSGA was enacted, but the KSGA was set out in a new article 47, K.”
Jenkins v. State, 87 P.3d 983 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “See K.S.A. 21-4702; K.S.A. 21-4704. Jenkins used his opportunity to contest the State’s contention that his criminal history score was A.”
State v. Collier, 513 P.3d 477 (Kan. 2022). “How was the district court to sentence Collier in 1993? The off-grid crime had no severity ranking; by what rationale could the court have found it to be the "crime with the highest crime severity ranking"? See K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4702(b)(2). There is simply no basis for…”
State v. Strickland, 933 P.2d 782 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). “See K.S.A. 21-4702. The State argues Strickland’s rationale cuts both ways.”
State v. Murdock, 323 P.3d 846 (Kan. 2014). “See K.S.A. 21-4702. One such glaring disparity was the treatment of nonviolent property crimes in our urban, suburban, and rural district courts.”
State v. Murdock ( (Kan. 2014). “See K.S.A. 21-4702. One such glaring disparity was the treatment of nonviolent property crimes in our urban, suburban, and rural district courts.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4702(b)(2) — 1 case
State v. Collier, 513 P.3d 477 (Kan. 2022). “How was the district court to sentence Collier in 1993? The off-grid crime had no severity ranking; by what rationale could the court have found it to be the "crime with the highest crime severity ranking"? See K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4702(b)(2). There is simply no basis for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.