K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4703 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4703.

History: L. 1992, ch. 239, § 3; L. 1994, ch. 291, § 49; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 95 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: State v. Hambright, 447 P.3d 972 (Kan. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Hambright, 447 P.3d 972 (Kan. 2019). · cites it 4× “21-6803(q) (formerly K.S.A. 21-4703 [q] [Furse 1995] ), and the term "departure" was defined as "a sentence 'which is inconsistent with the presumptive sentence for an offender,' " K.”
State v. Huff, 83 P.3d 206 (Kan. 2004). · cites it 7× “21-4608(a) does not apply to misdemeanors because the definition of “imprisonment” under K.S.A. 21-4703(m) does not include sentences that are served in a county jail.”
State v. Williams, 319 P.3d 528 (Kan. 2014). · cites it 3× “” K.S.A. 21-4703(q) defines a presumptive sentence as “the sentence provided in a grid block for an offender classified in that grid block by the combined effect of the crime severity ranking of the current crime of conviction and the offender’s criminal history.”
State v. Ballard, 218 P.3d 432 (Kan. 2009). · cites it 4× “” K.S.A. 21-4703(f). The KSGA further provides that appellate courts “shall not review: (I) Any sentence that is within the presumptive sentence for the crime.”
State v. Hankins, 372 P.3d 1124 (Kan. 2016). · cites it 3× “A. 21-4711(e). The question presented here is whether Hankins’ Oklahoma deferred judgment is to be classified as an out-of-state felony conviction for criminal history classification purposes under the KSGA.”
State v. Trautloff, 217 P.3d 15 (Kan. 2009). · cites it 3× “See K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4703; K.S.A. 1993 Supp.”
State v. Carr, 53 P.3d 843 (Kan. 2002). · cites it 4× “" Finally, K.S.A. 21-4703(s) says that the sentencing range is "the sentencing court's discretionary range in imposing a nonappealable sentence.”
State v. Ross, 289 P.3d 76 (Kan. 2012). · cites it 4× “The KSGA defines ‘presumptive sentence’ as ‘the sentence provided in a grid block for an offender classified in that grid block by the combined effect of the crime severity ranking of the current crime of conviction and the offender’s criminal history.”
State v. Gaudina, 160 P.3d 854 (Kan. 2007). · cites it 3× “Temporally, the period of post-release supervision does not occur during imprisonment but only comes “after having served a period of imprisonment” ([emphasis added] K.S.A. 21-4703[p]) and “upon the termination of the prison portion” of the sentence (K.”
State v. Ortega-Cadelan, 194 P.3d 1195 (Kan. 2008). · cites it 2× “Ortega-Cadelan’s sentence does not meet the K.S.A. 21-4703 definition of “presumptive sentence,” as his sentence was not issued pursuant to a number in a grid block.”
State v. Dull, 351 P.3d 641 (Kan. 2015). · cites it 3× “K.S.A. 21-4703(p) (defining ‘postrelease supervision’); K.”
State v. McCallum, 895 P.2d 1258 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 7× “” There are two types of departure under the KSGA: a dispositional departure (see K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4703[h]), and a durational departure (see K.”
Show all 95 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(1) — 2 cases
State v. Neal, 258 P.3d 365 (Kan. 2011).
State v. Jackson, 298 P.3d 344 (Kan. 2013).
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(c) — 24 cases
State v. Trautloff, 217 P.3d 15 (Kan. 2009). “See K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4703; K.S.A. 1993 Supp.”
State v. Roderick, 911 P.2d 159 (Kan. 1996).
State v. McCurry, 105 P.3d 1247 (Kan. 2005).
State v. Taylor, 939 P.2d 904 (Kan. 1997).
State v. Christensen, 937 P.2d 1239 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(d) — 6 cases
State v. LaMunyon, 911 P.2d 151 (Kan. 1996).
State v. Riley, 915 P.2d 774 (Kan. 1996).
State v. Mitchell, 939 P.2d 879 (Kan. 1997).
In re J.E.M., 890 P.2d 364 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
In Re Jem, 20 Kan. App. 2d 596 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(f) — 7 cases
State v. Gracey, 200 P.3d 1275 (Kan. 2009).
State v. Looney, 327 P.3d 425 (Kan. 2014).
State v. Ballard, 218 P.3d 432 (Kan. 2009). “” K.S.A. 21-4703(f). The KSGA further provides that appellate courts “shall not review: (I) Any sentence that is within the presumptive sentence for the crime.”
State v. Garcia, 56 P.3d 797 (Kan. 2002).
State v. Bost, 903 P.2d 160 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(g) — 3 cases
State v. McCallum, 895 P.2d 1258 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “” There are two types of departure under the KSGA: a dispositional departure (see K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4703[h]), and a durational departure (see K.”
State v. Peal, 893 P.2d 258 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
State v. Ware, 938 P.2d 197 (Kan. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(h) — 4 cases
State v. Richardson, 901 P.2d 1 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
State v. McCallum, 895 P.2d 1258 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “” There are two types of departure under the KSGA: a dispositional departure (see K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4703[h]), and a durational departure (see K.”
State v. Trimble, 894 P.2d 920 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
State v. Peal, 893 P.2d 258 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(i) — 2 cases
State v. Hambright, 447 P.3d 972 (Kan. 2019). “21-6803(q) (formerly K.S.A. 21-4703 [q] [Furse 1995] ), and the term "departure" was defined as "a sentence 'which is inconsistent with the presumptive sentence for an offender,' " K.”
State v. Bost, 903 P.2d 160 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(j) — 1 case
State v. Golston, 7 P.3d 1132 (Kan. 2000).
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(m) — 4 cases
State v. Huff, 83 P.3d 206 (Kan. 2004). “21-4608(a) does not apply to misdemeanors because the definition of “imprisonment” under K.S.A. 21-4703(m) does not include sentences that are served in a county jail.”
State v. Huff, 71 P.3d 1185 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).
Faulkner v. State, 911 P.2d 203 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996).
Trimble v. Kansas, 927 F. Supp. 401 (D. Kan. 1996).
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(n) — 1 case
State v. Hines, 294 P.3d 270 (Kan. 2013).
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(o) — 4 cases
State v. Hambright, 447 P.3d 972 (Kan. 2019). “21-6803(q) (formerly K.S.A. 21-4703 [q] [Furse 1995] ), and the term "departure" was defined as "a sentence 'which is inconsistent with the presumptive sentence for an offender,' " K.”
State v. Heath, 901 P.2d 29 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
State v. Dillard, 890 P.2d 1248 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
United States v. Dighera (10th Cir. 1999).
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(p) — 19 cases
State v. Mossman, 281 P.3d 153 (Kan. 2012).
State v. Gaudina, 160 P.3d 854 (Kan. 2007). “Temporally, the period of post-release supervision does not occur during imprisonment but only comes “after having served a period of imprisonment” ([emphasis added] K.S.A. 21-4703[p]) and “upon the termination of the prison portion” of the sentence (K.”
State v. Ballard, 218 P.3d 432 (Kan. 2009). “” K.S.A. 21-4703(f). The KSGA further provides that appellate courts “shall not review: (I) Any sentence that is within the presumptive sentence for the crime.”
State v. Funk, 349 P.3d 1230 (Kan. 2015).
In re L.M., 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008).
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(q) — 18 cases
State v. Williams, 319 P.3d 528 (Kan. 2014). “” K.S.A. 21-4703(q) defines a presumptive sentence as “the sentence provided in a grid block for an offender classified in that grid block by the combined effect of the crime severity ranking of the current crime of conviction and the offender’s criminal history.”
State v. Hankins, 372 P.3d 1124 (Kan. 2016). “A. 21-4711(e). The question presented here is whether Hankins’ Oklahoma deferred judgment is to be classified as an out-of-state felony conviction for criminal history classification purposes under the KSGA.”
State v. Ross, 289 P.3d 76 (Kan. 2012). “The KSGA defines ‘presumptive sentence’ as ‘the sentence provided in a grid block for an offender classified in that grid block by the combined effect of the crime severity ranking of the current crime of conviction and the offender’s criminal history.”
State v. Ballard, 218 P.3d 432 (Kan. 2009). “” K.S.A. 21-4703(f). The KSGA further provides that appellate courts “shall not review: (I) Any sentence that is within the presumptive sentence for the crime.”
State v. Dull, 351 P.3d 641 (Kan. 2015). “K.S.A. 21-4703(p) (defining ‘postrelease supervision’); K.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(r) — 8 cases
State v. Huff, 83 P.3d 206 (Kan. 2004). “21-4608(a) does not apply to misdemeanors because the definition of “imprisonment” under K.S.A. 21-4703(m) does not include sentences that are served in a county jail.”
State v. McCallum, 895 P.2d 1258 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “” There are two types of departure under the KSGA: a dispositional departure (see K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4703[h]), and a durational departure (see K.”
State v. Peal, 893 P.2d 258 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
State v. Bost, 903 P.2d 160 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
State v. Trimble, 894 P.2d 920 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(s) — 2 cases
State v. Carr, 53 P.3d 843 (Kan. 2002). “" Finally, K.S.A. 21-4703(s) says that the sentencing range is "the sentencing court's discretionary range in imposing a nonappealable sentence.”
State v. Sisk, 966 P.2d 671 (Kan. 1998).
— K.S.A. § 21-4703(t) — 2 cases
State v. McCallum, 895 P.2d 1258 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). “” There are two types of departure under the KSGA: a dispositional departure (see K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4703[h]), and a durational departure (see K.”
State v. Peal, 893 P.2d 258 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.