K.S.A. § 23-201
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
23-201.
History: G.S. 1868, ch. 62, § 1; R.S. 1923, 23-201; L. 1976, ch. 172, § 1; L. 1978, ch. 134, § 1; L. 1981, ch. 159, § 1; L. 1987, ch. 120, § 1; L. 1998, ch. 162, § 1; Repealed, L. 2011, ch. 26, § 47; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 64
cases, 1978–2016 · leading case: In Re the Marriage of Hair
In Re the Marriage of Hair (2008)
“Leona argues that the district court's decision was erroneous because the district court's designation of the World Savings accounts as Terry's separate property, when the accounts were held as joint accounts, violated K.S.A. 23-201(b) and K.S.A.2007 Supp. 60-1610(b).”
Nicholas v. Nicholas (2004)
“Ruby no longer had a vested interest in the property pursuant to K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 23-201. . We hold that Sheryl did not dispose of property by changing or designating a beneficiary on the TOD or POD accounts or changing the beneficiary on the life insurance policy.”
Lampe v. Iola Bank & Trust (In Re Lampe) (2002)
“Relying on Kan. Stat. Ann. § 23-201 [7] and a rebuttable presumption that jointly owned property is owned equally by the owners thereof, see *212 Walnut Valley State Bank v.”
In Re Marriage of Cray (1994)
“2d 358 (1978), and K.S.A. 23-201(b) in asserting that the date of the filing of the petition is the earliest date for valuation of the marital assets in a dissolution of marriage action.”
In Re Hilt (1994)
“In 1978, the Legislature added subsection (b) to K.S.A. § 23-201 to clarify the income tax effect of a division of property in a Kansas divorce.”
In Re the Marriage of Sedbrook (1992)
“875 (1984), the trial court ruled, as a matter of law, that the pension could only be considered as a source of funds in determining Delbert’s ability to pay spousal support because (1) it was not specifically defined as marital property pursuant to K.S.A. 23-201, (2) it was…”
Wachholz v. Wachholz (1979)
“John Wachholz asserts that under K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 23-201 his interest is separate property by reason of the gifts from Nancy’s parents to him and thus not subject to division pursuant to K.”
Guffy Ex Rel. Reeves v. Guffy (1981)
“" As to property owned by the parties at the time of the marriage, K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 23-201( a ) provides: "The property, real and personal, which any person in this state may own at the time of his or her marriage, and the rents, issues, profits or proceeds thereof, and *91 any…”
In Re the Estate of Lane (2008)
“See K.S.A. 23-201. We agree with the conclusion in Lampe that whether they are co-owners of specific property is determined by their intent and conduct: "This test recognizes the practical realities of the marital relationship.”
In Re the Marriage of Sommers (1990)
“K.S.A. 23-201(b) provides: "All property owned by married persons, including the present value of any vested or unvested military retirement pay, whether described in subsection (a) or acquired by either spouse after marriage, and whether held individually or by the spouses in…”
In Re Vollen (2010)
“Kan. Stat. Ann. § 23-201 (a) (2007). 40 .”
Bender v. Bender (2001)
“We note that, as a practical matter, by awarding the plaintiff “one half of the disability and/or retirement benefits earned by [the defendant] from his employment by the city of Meriden for his labors for said city through the date of this decree(emphasis added); the trial…”
— K.S.A. § 23-201(a) — 4 cases
Guffy Ex Rel. Reeves v. Guffy (1981)
“" As to property owned by the parties at the time of the marriage, K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 23-201( a ) provides: "The property, real and personal, which any person in this state may own at the time of his or her marriage, and the rents, issues, profits or proceeds thereof, and *91 any…”
In Re Brollier (1994)
Ebert v. Ebert (1983)
Parkman v. Farr (1992)
— K.S.A. § 23-201(b) — 38 cases
In Re the Marriage of Hair (2008)
“Leona argues that the district court's decision was erroneous because the district court's designation of the World Savings accounts as Terry's separate property, when the accounts were held as joint accounts, violated K.S.A. 23-201(b) and K.S.A.2007 Supp. 60-1610(b).”
Nicholas v. Nicholas (2004)
“Ruby no longer had a vested interest in the property pursuant to K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 23-201. . We hold that Sheryl did not dispose of property by changing or designating a beneficiary on the TOD or POD accounts or changing the beneficiary on the life insurance policy.”
In Re Marriage of Cray (1994)
“2d 358 (1978), and K.S.A. 23-201(b) in asserting that the date of the filing of the petition is the earliest date for valuation of the marital assets in a dissolution of marriage action.”
In Re the Marriage of Sedbrook (1992)
“875 (1984), the trial court ruled, as a matter of law, that the pension could only be considered as a source of funds in determining Delbert’s ability to pay spousal support because (1) it was not specifically defined as marital property pursuant to K.S.A. 23-201, (2) it was…”
In Re the Marriage of Sommers (1990)
“K.S.A. 23-201(b) provides: "All property owned by married persons, including the present value of any vested or unvested military retirement pay, whether described in subsection (a) or acquired by either spouse after marriage, and whether held individually or by the spouses in…”
— K.S.A. § 23-201(b)(1) — 1 case
In Re Hilt (1994)
“In 1978, the Legislature added subsection (b) to K.S.A. § 23-201 to clarify the income tax effect of a division of property in a Kansas divorce.”
— K.S.A. § 23-201(c) — 1 case
Stevens v. Stevens (1982)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.