History:
L. 1970, ch. 166, § 6; Repealed, L. 1985, ch. 114, § 30; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Paternity proceeding hereunder dismissed; conception of child by consenting parties did not constitute tortious act under long-arm statute (K.S.A. 60-308). State, ex rel., v. Schutts, 217 Kan. 175, 176, 535 P.2d 982.
2. Section is not violative of equal protection clauses of federal and state constitutions. State, ex rel. Wingard v. Sill, 223 Kan. 661, 576 P.2d 620.
Skillett v. Sierra, 53 P.3d 1234 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2דIn Wingard, the order was made under K.S.A. 38-1106 (Ensley 1981), and defendant in that case claimed that statute was unconstitutional because K.”
State Ex Rel. Wingard v. Sill, 576 P.2d 620 (Kan. 1978). · cites it 10דAlthough Alfred Eugene Sill was found to be the father, plaintiff appeals because the district court (1) found K.S.A. 38-1106 to be unconstitutional and (2) allowed the father visitation rights with the child.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.