Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 46-901 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
46-901.
History: L. 1970, ch. 200, § 1; Repealed, L. 1979, ch. 186, § 33; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1973–2022 · leading case: Brown v. Wichita State Univ., 547 P.2d 1015 (Kan. 1976).
Brown v. Wichita State Univ., 547 P.2d 1015 (Kan. 1976). “Assuming the answer to the foregoing question is in the affirmative, does Chapter 200, Laws of 1970, (K.S.A. 46-901 et seq. ) offend constitutional guarantees in Sections 1, 2 and 18 of the Kansas Bill of Rights, the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States…”
Flax v. Kansas Tpk. Auth., 596 P.2d 446 (Kan. 1979). “This time the application of K.S.A. 46-901 to highway defects upon the Kansas turnpike is in question.”
Brown v. Wichita State Univ., 540 P.2d 66 (Kan. 1975). “Following a hearing on defendant's motion, the district court held: (1) the governmental immunity statutes, K.S.A. 46-901 et seq., were constitutional and barred plaintiffs' tort and implied warranty claims against Wichita State, and (2) assuming for purposes of the summary…”
Schmeck v. City of Shawnee, 651 P.2d 585 (Kan. 1982). “The legislature immediately reinstated governmental immunity by enacting K.S.A. 46-901 (Weeks) and 46-902 (Weeks) (now repealed).”
Durflinger v. Artiles, 673 P.2d 86 (Kan. 1983). “K.S.A. 46-901 (Weeks) was the governmental immunity statute in effect at the pertinent time herein (1974).”
Nocktonick Ex Rel. Matson v. Nocktonick, 611 P.2d 135 (Kan. 1980). “The legislature at its next session enacted K.S.A. 46-901 et seq., (L. 1970, ch. 200, §§ 1-13) and reimposed legislatively the governmental immunity which the court in Carroll v.”
Hendrix Ex Rel. Smith v. City of Topeka, 643 P.2d 129 (Kan. 1982). “At this point in time both the state and municipality had immunity from any tort liability therefor, pursuant to K.S.A. 46-901 et seq. [repealed L. 1979, ch.”
Wheat v. Finney, 630 P.2d 1160 (Kan. 1981). “In 1970, K.S.A. 46-901 was passed providing: “(a) It is hereby declared and provided that the following shall be immune from liability and suit on an implied contract, or for negligence or any other tort, except as is otherwise specifically provided by statute: “(1) The state of…”
Griffin v. Rogers, 653 P.2d 463 (Kan. 1982). “The action against the Park Authority, therefore, sounds in tort, and it is immune from liability under K.S.A. 46-901 (Weeks), then in effect, unless it waived its immunity.”
Hopkins v. State, 702 P.2d 311 (Kan. 1985). “The legislature responded to the Carroll decision by enacting K.S.A. 46-901 et seq. (Weeks). These statutes declared the state, its departments, agencies, institutions, etc.”
Durflinger v. Artiles, 727 F.2d 888 (10th Cir. 1984). “139 K.S.A. 46-901 (Weeks) was the governmental immunity statute in effect at the pertinent time herein (1974).”
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Kansas House of Representatives, 687 P.2d 622 (Kan. 1984). “, was enacted, which subjects governmental entities to liability for damages caused by the negligence of its employees acting within the scope of their employment.”
— K.S.A. § 46-901(a) — 2 cases
Durflinger v. Artiles, 673 P.2d 86 (Kan. 1983). “K.S.A. 46-901 (Weeks) was the governmental immunity statute in effect at the pertinent time herein (1974).”
Wheat v. Finney, 630 P.2d 1160 (Kan. 1981). “In 1970, K.S.A. 46-901 was passed providing: “(a) It is hereby declared and provided that the following shall be immune from liability and suit on an implied contract, or for negligence or any other tort, except as is otherwise specifically provided by statute: “(1) The state of…”
— K.S.A. § 46-901(c) — 1 case
Griffin v. Rogers, 653 P.2d 463 (Kan. 1982). “The action against the Park Authority, therefore, sounds in tort, and it is immune from liability under K.S.A. 46-901 (Weeks), then in effect, unless it waived its immunity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.