K.S.A. § 46-903

Payment of claims based upon implied contracts, when

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

46-903. Payment of claims based upon implied contracts, when. No money or funds shall be disbursed from the state treasury or any special fund of the state of Kansas in part or full satisfaction or payment of any claim or judgment based in whole or in part on an implied contract, unless the payment of such claim or judgment has been specifically authorized by act of the legislature.

History: L. 1970, ch. 200, § 3; L. 1979, ch. 186, § 23; July 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: Wheat v. Finney

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wheat v. Finney (1981) kan · cites it 3× “As to the period from July 1, 1979, to the date these assessments were discontinued our attention is called to the provisions of K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 46-903, which reads: “No money or funds shall be disbursed from the state treasury or any special fund of the state of Kansas in…”

Sharp v. State (1989) kan “A claim for unjust enrichment is in substance an action in implied contract, and, under K.S.A. 46-903 and K.S.A. 46-907, such a claim may not be maintained against the State unless plaintiffs have previously filed a claim on which payment has been denied.”

Dehn v. Board of Regents for Kansas Colleges and Universities, State of Kansas (2025) ksd · cites it 8× “2d at 1163– 64 (“K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 46-903 and 46-907 provide a statutory requirement that claims based on implied contracts be filed with a special claims committee; such filing and processing are held to 9 Defendant also argues that Kansas law doesn’t allow implied contract…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.