K.S.A. » Chapter 50

K.S.A. § 50-107

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

50-107.

History: L. 1897, ch. 265, § 7; R.S. 1923, 50-107; Repealed, L. 2000, ch. 136, § 28; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Section contemplates only civil actions. The State v. Jack, 69 Kan. 387, 76 P. 911. Affirmed: Jack v. Kansas, 199 U.S. 372, 26 S. Ct. 73, 50 L. Ed. 234.

2. Contract for commissions by member of livestock trust void. The State v. Wilson, 73 Kan. 334, 343, 80 P. 639, 84 P. 737.

3. Contracts for exclusive sale of merchandise are valid. McConkey v. Motor Co., 112 Kan. 560, 211 P. 631.

4. Contract requiring retailer to maintain seller's list prices violates statute. Mills v. Ordnance Co., 113 Kan. 479, 215 P. 314.

5. Contract requiring wheat grower to sell to association upheld. Wheat Growers Ass'n v. Rowan, 123 Kan. 169, 254 P. 326; Wheat Growers Ass'n v. Oden, 124 Kan. 179, 257 P. 975.

6. Contract for purchase and resale price of ice held invalid and unenforceable. Joslin v. Steffen Ice & Ice Cream Co., 143 Kan. 409, 412, 54 P.2d 941.

7. Defense that agreement is void and unenforceable not barred by one year limitation. Morrison v. Brandt, 145 Kan. 942, 950, 67 P.2d 584.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1959–1980 · leading case: In Re Wiring Device Antitrust Litigation
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Wiring Device Antitrust Litigation (1980) nyed “There is no precedent for the extraordinary penalty Robinette claims that the South Carolina statute imposes. Five other states have enacted statutes which permit the recovery of the full purchase price of goods sold in connection with antitrust violations.”
Okerberg v. Crable (1959) kan · cites it 2× “Such an agreement which is contrary to the public policy of the State of Kansas as defined by the legislature in the statutes referred to above is by the provisions of Section 50-107 of the statutes of Kansas not enforceable in any of the (courts of this state.”
Robinette Hardware Co. v. Square D Co. (1980) nyed “Five other states have enacted statutes which permit the recovery of the full purchase price of goods sold in connection with antitrust vio *87 lations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.