K.S.A. » Chapter 50

K.S.A. § 50-602

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

50-602.

History: L. 1968, ch. 341, § 2; Repealed, L. 1973, ch. 217, § 22; January 1, 1974.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Assurance of discontinuance filed under K.S.A. 50-610 not court order; not punishable for contempt. State v. McPherson, 208 Kan. 511, 514, 493 P.2d 228.

2. Cited in dissent. Complaint did not fall within purview of unlawful practices listed in section. Hunter v. Haun, 210 Kan. 11, 14, 15, 499 P.2d 1087.

3. Misrepresentations found to have been perpetrated in merchandising and recruitment scheme. State, ex rel., v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., 212 Kan. 668, 669, 674, 675, 676, 678, 511 P.2d 416.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1972–1991 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Commemorative Services Corp.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Commemorative Services Corp. (1991) kanctapp “*399 The State argues that the KCPA was a successor to the Kansas Buyer Protection Act of 1968, K.S.A. 50-602 et seq. It submits that Act, as well as the common law, allowed remedies for the wrongful acts of Anderson.”
Hunter v. Haun (1972) kan “50-601 ( b ) of "merchandise" does not include real estate located in Kansas, and the complaint lodged with the county attorney did not fall within the purview of those practices declared unlawful by K.S.A. 1969 Supp. 50-602. The statute 50-602, which defines the practices…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.