Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 50-602 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

50-602.

History: L. 1968, ch. 341, § 2; Repealed, L. 1973, ch. 217, § 22; January 1, 1974.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Assurance of discontinuance filed under K.S.A. 50-610 not court order; not punishable for contempt. State v. McPherson, 208 Kan. 511, 514, 493 P.2d 228.

2. Cited in dissent. Complaint did not fall within purview of unlawful practices listed in section. Hunter v. Haun, 210 Kan. 11, 14, 15, 499 P.2d 1087.

3. Misrepresentations found to have been perpetrated in merchandising and recruitment scheme. State, ex rel., v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., 212 Kan. 668, 669, 674, 675, 676, 678, 511 P.2d 416.


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1972–1991 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Commemorative Servs. Corp., 823 P.2d 831 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Commemorative Servs. Corp., 823 P.2d 831 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). “This action was not prosecuted either under the common law or the Kansas Buyer Protection Act.”
Hunter v. Haun, 499 P.2d 1087 (Kan. 1972). “50-601 ( b ) of "merchandise" does not include real estate located in Kansas, and the complaint lodged with the county attorney did not fall within the purview of those practices declared unlawful by K.S.A. 1969 Supp. 50-602. The statute 50-602, which defines the practices…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.