K.S.A. § 59-2952

Petition for involuntary commitment of a voluntary patient

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

59-2952. Petition for involuntary commitment of a voluntary patient. The head of a treatment facility or other person may file a petition pursuant to K.S.A. 59-2957 and amendments thereto seeking involuntary commitment of a voluntary patient who now lacks capacity to make an informed decision concerning treatment and who is refusing reasonable treatment efforts or has requested discharge from the treatment facility. A petition filed by the head of a state psychiatric hospital, or such person's designee, accompanied by a statement from a physician or psychologist employed at the hospital that the physician or psychologist believes the person to be a mentally ill person subject to involuntary commitment does not need to be accompanied by a written statement from a qualified mental health professional authorizing admission to a state psychiatric hospital.

History: L. 1996, ch. 167, § 8; L. 1998, ch. 134, § 39; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Outpatient mental health center owed no duty to those injured by patient. Adams v. Board of Sedgwick County Comm'rs, 289 Kan. 577, 214 P.3d 1173 (2009).


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2006–2009 · leading case: Adams v. Board of Sedgwick County Commissioners
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Adams v. Board of Sedgwick County Commissioners (2009) kan “65) (Currently, K.S.A. 59-2952 provides that the head of a treatment facility “may file a petition .”
Adams v. BOARD OF SEDGWICK COUNTY COM'RS (2009) kan “65) (Currently, K.S.A. 59-2952 provides that the head of a treatment facility " may file a petition .”
Estate of Pemberton v. John's Sports Center, Inc. (2006) kanctapp “See K.S.A. 59-2952 et seq. Under these statutes, a voluntaiy patient may be detained for emergency observation, presumably to allow the facility or family to attempt an involuntary commitment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.