K.S.A. » Chapter 60

K.S.A. § 60-101

Citation of act

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-101. Citation of act. This act may be cited as the code of civil procedure.

History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-101; L. 2010, ch. 135, § 64; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1979–2024 · leading case: State v. Thomas
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Thomas (2018) kan · cites it 2× “, not the Kansas Code of Civil Procedure, K.S.A. 60-101 et seq. Moreover, the criminal court proceeding is the only place the Legislature has established to deal with registration matters.”
State v. Miller (2018) kan · cites it 2× “60-242(b) is part of the Kansas Code of Civil Procedure, K.S.A. 60-101 et seq., and no counterpart is contained in the Kansas Code of Criminal Procedure, K.”
Neighbor v. Westar Energy, Inc. (2015) kan · cites it 2× “” Civil actions are generally governed by the time limitations in Article 5 of the Kansas Code of Civil Procedure, K.S.A. 60-101 et seq. Because Article 5 of the code includes K.”
Patterson v. Brouhard (1990) kan · cites it 2× “” Prior to the dismissal of the action, no cross-claim had been filed by Patterson in the limited action for damages caused by Brouhard.”
Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Department of Revenue (2005) kan “This issue raises the larger and overriding question of the applicability of the Code of Civil Procedure, K.S.A. 60-101 et seq., to appeals being taken under the authority of the Kansas Act for Judicial Review and Civil Enforcement of Agency Actions (KJRA), K.”
State v. Cremer (1984) kan · cites it 2× “In 1963, the legislature enacted the Kansas Code of Civil Procedure (K.S.A. 60-101 et seq. ). K.S.A. 60-402, which is set forth above, provides in substance that the evidentiary rules set forth in the code shall apply in every proceeding, both criminal and civil, conducted by or…”
State v. Mitchell (1983) kan “Examples are the Code of Civil Procedure, K.S.A. 60-101 et seq. and the Code of Criminal Procedure, K.”
State Ex Rel. Topeka Police Department v. $895.00 U.S. Currency (2006) kan “60-4112(q) provides that “[e]xcept as otherwise provided by this act, all proceedings hereunder shall be governed by the rules of civil procedure pursuant to K.S.A. 60-101 et seq., and amendments thereto.”
Williams v. Lawton (2007) kanctapp · cites it 2× “In addition, upon remand, arguments of trial error remain which may be made by Lawton that are appealable as a matter of right. By granting the interlocutory appeal in this case, we have set up the possibility of piecemeal appeals which have not been approved since we adopted…”
State v. McGaugh (2018) kanctapp “See K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 60-101. A party in a civil action may thus invoke the appellate jurisdiction of the court of appeals from a final decision.”
Ellis v. City of Kansas City (1979) kan “The cases just cited, excepting Rostine , were all decided before January 1, 1964, the effective date of both the code of civil procedure, K.S.A. 60-101 et seq., and the eminent domain procedure act, K.”
In re the Estate of Wolf (2005) kan “*724 In the alternative, M&W argues that its pleading was adequate when measured against the requirements of the Kansas Code of Civil Procedure, K.S.A. 60-101 et seq. K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 60-209(h) provides: “Whenever a claim, defense or counterclaim is founded upon a written…”
Show all 22 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.