K.S.A. » Chapter 60
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-1305 (2026)

Appeal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-1305. Appeal. An aggrieved party may, within 14 days, appeal from an order appointing or refusing to appoint a receiver without awaiting final determination of the proceeding. If a receiver has been appointed and the appellant files an appeal bond with such terms and conditions as the judge may direct, the appointment shall be suspended and the property retained in the possession of the appellant pending the final determination of the appeal.

History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-1305; L. 2010, ch. 135, § 174; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2021 · leading case: IAS Partners, Ltd. v. Chambers, 213 P.3d 751 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
IAS Partners, Ltd. v. Chambers, 213 P.3d 751 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “Hayes also argues that Chambers had the option under K.S.A. 60-1305 of appealing direcdy from the appointment of a receiver.”
In Re Metcalf Assocs.-2000, LLC, 213 P.3d 751 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “Hayes also argues that Chambers had the option under K.S.A. 60-1305 of appealing directly from the appointment of a receiver.”
City of Mulvane v. Henderson, 257 P.3d 1272 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). “Midwest does not challenge the district court’s acceptance of an oral motion from D&D; however, it does challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to justify tire appointment of a receiver. The Motion to Intervene Although, on appeal, all parties discuss the issue of whether or…”
Hutton v. Rainbow Tower Assocs., 601 P.2d 665 (Kan. 1979). “The appeal is taken pursuant to the provisions of K.S.A. 60-1305. For convenience the appellant will be referred to as Rainbow or defendant and the appellee as Hutton or plaintiff.”
Delaware Ridge Homes Assn. v. Maddy (Kan. Ct. App. 2021). “60-2102(a)(3) and K.S.A. 60-1305, the statutes governing 9 interlocutory appeals from a district court decision appointing a receiver, the district court's order was narrowly limited to its decision not to appoint Bye as a receiver under Kansas statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.