to General Assembly -- Reorganization plans -- Legislative monitoring --
Lapsed funds.
(1) Recognizing the necessity for grouping related functions of organizational units and
administrative bodies in order to promote greater economy, efficiency and improved
administration, the Governor, the Kentucky Economic Development Partnership as
created in KRS 154.10-010, and other elected state executive officers may propose
to the General Assembly, for its approval, changes in the state government
organizational structure which may include the creation, alteration or abolition of
any organizational unit or administrative body and the transfer of functions,
personnel, funds, equipment, facilities, and records from one (1) organizational unit
or administrative body to another.
(2) Any reorganization proposed under subsection (1) of this section shall be set forth
in a reorganization plan which shall be filed with the Legislative Research
Commission. The plan shall include:
(a) An explanation of each proposed change, including the need for the change;
(b) An estimate of any reduction or increase in expenditures, itemized as far as
practicable, which the promulgating officer expects will result from the
reorganization;
(c) A description of any improvements in the management, delivery of state
services, and efficiency of state government operations which the
promulgating officer expects will be realized as a result of the reorganization;
and
(d) Specification of the effects of the reorganization on the budget and personnel
of each affected organizational unit or administrative body, including but not
limited to the amount of funds and the number of employees that will be
transferred from one (1) organizational unit or administrative body to another,
any reductions in the state workforce resulting from the reorganization, and
the methods to be utilized to achieve such reductions.
(3) The Legislative Research Commission or the Legislative Oversight and
Investigations Committee may monitor the implementation of any reorganization
plan to determine the extent to which the anticipated improvements in economy,
efficiency, or administration have been realized as a result of the reorganization and
shall report its findings to the General Assembly.
(4) Funds transferred due to reorganization shall be maintained in separately designated
accounts. Any excess funds resulting from a reorganization shall lapse to the
general fund surplus account.
Effective: March 12, 2021
History: Amended 2021 Ky. Acts ch. 5, sec. 1, effective February 2, 2021; and ch. 14,
sec. 9, effective March 12, 2021. -- Amended 1992 Ky. Acts ch. 105, sec. 61,
effective July 14, 1992. -- Amended 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 306, sec. 2, effective April 9,
1984. -- Created 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 447, sec. 2, effective January 1, 1984.
Legislative Research Commission Note (3/12/21). this statute was amended by 2021
Ky. Acts chs. 5 and 14, which do not appear to be in conflict and have been codified
together.
Notes of Decisions
Carreer v. Cabinet for Health & Fam. Servs., 339 S.W.3d 477 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010).
“While such reorganizations are being implemented, the head of any department is authorized to “abolish unnecessary offices and positions, transfer officers and employees between positions, and change the duties, titles and compensation of existing offices and positions_” KRS 12.”
Houchens v. Beshear (E.D. Ky. 2020).
· cites it 20× “] Plaintiffs also seek a declaration from this Court on the constitutionality of KRS § 12.028 and whether it violates the separation of powers doctrine in the Kentucky Constitution.”
Gary Houchens v. Andy Beshear (6th Cir. 2021).
· cites it 19× “” See KRS § 12.028. As Governor Beshear abolished the BOE between General Assembly sessions, Plaintiffs did not have a property interest in their continued board membership, nor do they have a cognizable claim for a violation of either procedural or substantive due process…”
Houchens v. Beshear (E.D. Ky. 2020).
· cites it 16× “Plaintiffs also seek a declaration on the constitutionality of KRS § 12.028 and whether it violates the separation of powers doctrine of the Kentucky Constitution.”
Univ. of Kentucky, A/K/A Uk Healthcare v. Sarah R. Moore (Ky. 2019).
“” 19 After a dispute arose as to the Governor’s authority under KRS 12.028 to abolish and reorganize the board of a state university, the General Assembly passed 18 These provisions, however, do not undermine the university boards’ fundamental independence.”
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Dep't of Revenue v. Sarah R. Moore (Ky. 2019).
“” 19 After a dispute arose as to the Governor’s authority under KRS 12.028 to abolish and reorganize the board of a state university, the General Assembly passed 18 These provisions, however, do not undermine the university boards’ fundamental independence.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 12.028(1) — 4 cases
Houchens v. Beshear (E.D. Ky. 2020).
“] Plaintiffs also seek a declaration from this Court on the constitutionality of KRS § 12.028 and whether it violates the separation of powers doctrine in the Kentucky Constitution.”
Houchens v. Beshear (E.D. Ky. 2020).
“Plaintiffs also seek a declaration on the constitutionality of KRS § 12.028 and whether it violates the separation of powers doctrine of the Kentucky Constitution.”
Gary Houchens v. Andy Beshear (6th Cir. 2021).
“” See KRS § 12.028. As Governor Beshear abolished the BOE between General Assembly sessions, Plaintiffs did not have a property interest in their continued board membership, nor do they have a cognizable claim for a violation of either procedural or substantive due process…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 12.028(2) — 3 cases
Houchens v. Beshear (E.D. Ky. 2020).
“] Plaintiffs also seek a declaration from this Court on the constitutionality of KRS § 12.028 and whether it violates the separation of powers doctrine in the Kentucky Constitution.”
Houchens v. Beshear (E.D. Ky. 2020).
“Plaintiffs also seek a declaration on the constitutionality of KRS § 12.028 and whether it violates the separation of powers doctrine of the Kentucky Constitution.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 12.028(5) — 1 case
Houchens v. Beshear (E.D. Ky. 2020).
“] Plaintiffs also seek a declaration from this Court on the constitutionality of KRS § 12.028 and whether it violates the separation of powers doctrine in the Kentucky Constitution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.