property -- Methods of examination -- Emergency revaluation.
(1) (a) Each parcel of taxable real property or interest therein subject to assessment
by the property valuation administrator shall be revalued during each year of
each term of office by the property valuation administrator at its fair cash
value in accordance with standards and procedures prescribed by the
department and shall be examined no less than once every four (4) years by
the property valuation administrator.
(b) For any real property upon which any improvements have been made since the
prior examination, the property valuation administrator or his or her deputy
shall perform an on-site, in-person visual examination of the real property and
the improvements. The examination shall be conducted in a manner approved
by the department and for the purpose of gathering any necessary information
related to the characteristics of the real property and the improvements for
purposes of assessing their value. Any subsequent examination of the real
property for purposes of assessing its value by the property valuation
administrator or his or her deputy shall be performed by:
1. On-site, in-person visual examination;
2. Use of digital imaging technology as defined by the International
Association of Assessing Officers Standard on Mass Appraisal of Real
Property; or
3. Any other examination method approved by the department.
(c) In accordance with standards and procedures prescribed by the department, the
property valuation administrator shall submit an assessment schedule to the
department and shall maintain a record of the examination and revaluation for
each parcel of real property which shall include the inspection dates and any
other relevant information.
(2) The right of any individual to appeal the assessment on his property in any year as
provided in KRS 133.120 shall in no way be affected by this section.
(3) If the property valuation administrator fails to revalue property as required by this
section, the department shall have the authority to order an emergency revaluation
in the same manner as provided for emergency assessments by KRS 132.660. Any
property valuation administrator willfully violating the provisions of subsection (1)
of this section or who refuses to comply with the directions of the department to
correct the assessment shall have his compensation suspended by the department
and shall be subject to removal from office as provided by KRS 132.370(4) and
shall be subject to the provisions of KRS 132.620 and 61.120.
(4) Nothing in this section shall prohibit action by the department under the provisions
of KRS 133.150 or 132.660 in any year in which the department determines such
action to be necessary.
Effective: March 21, 2017
History: Amended 2017 Ky. Acts ch. 81, sec. 1, effective March 21, 2017. -- Amended
2005 Ky. Acts ch. 85, sec. 219, effective June 20, 2005. -- Repealed and reenacted
1990 Ky. Acts ch. 476, Pt. V, sec. 331, effective July 13, 1990. -- Amended 1988
Ky. Acts ch. 418, sec. 6, effective July 15, 1988. -- Amended 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 319,
sec. 4, effective July 15, 1980. -- Amended 1979 (1st Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 25,
sec. 9, effective February 13, 1979. -- Created 1960 Ky. Acts ch. 186, Art. I, sec. 16,
effective December 4, 1961.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
10
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1978–2025 · leading case:
Allphin v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 483 (Ky. 1981).
Allphin v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 483 (Ky. 1981).
· cites it 12× “The Department then ordered the PVAs to raise the submitted assessments under penalty of having their salaries withheld pursuant to KRS 132.690. The dispositive issue becomes whether the Department has the statutory power to reject the tendered assessments.”
Layson v. Brady, 576 S.W.2d 223 (Ky. Ct. App. 1978).
“There is no indication that the PVA was violating KRS 132.690 or 132.700. Furthermore, it would be physically impossible for a local PVA to make on-sight inspections of all properties in a county within any year, considering the manpower and financial resources available for the…”
Revenue Cabinet v. Leary, 880 S.W.2d 878 (Ky. Ct. App. 1994).
· cites it 2× “KRS 132.690 provides that: Each parcel of taxable real property or interest therein subject to assessment by the [PVA] shall be revalued during each year of each term of office by the [PVA] at its fair cash value in accordance with standards prescribed by the Revenue Cabinet and…”
Bill Dunn, McCracken Cnty. Prop. Valuation Adm'r v. Saratoga, LLC (Ky. Ct. App. 2024).
· cites it 4× “The PVA’s duties are set forth in KRS 132.690. KRS 132.690(1)(a) provides that [e]ach parcel of taxable real property or interest therein subject to assessment by the property valuation administrator shall be revalued during each year of each term of office by the [PVA] at its…”
Bill Dunn, McCracken Cnty. Prop. Valuation Adm'r v. Saratoga, LLC (Ky. Ct. App. 2024).
· cites it 4× “The PVA’s duties are set forth in KRS 132.690. KRS 132.690(1)(a) provides that [e]ach parcel of taxable real property or interest therein subject to assessment by the property valuation administrator shall be revalued during each year of each term of office by the [PVA] at its…”
Revenue Cabinet Commonwealth v. Est. of Young, 748 S.W.2d 167 (Ky. Ct. App. 1988).
“Allphin, supra at 485 ; KRS 132.690(3); KRS 133.040(1). Therefore, the PVA does not act independently of the Revenue Cabinet, and the cabinet is not bound by his assessments.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 132.690(1) — 3 cases
Allphin v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 483 (Ky. 1981).
“The Department then ordered the PVAs to raise the submitted assessments under penalty of having their salaries withheld pursuant to KRS 132.690. The dispositive issue becomes whether the Department has the statutory power to reject the tendered assessments.”
Bill Dunn, McCracken Cnty. Prop. Valuation Adm'r v. Saratoga, LLC (Ky. Ct. App. 2024).
“The PVA’s duties are set forth in KRS 132.690. KRS 132.690(1)(a) provides that [e]ach parcel of taxable real property or interest therein subject to assessment by the property valuation administrator shall be revalued during each year of each term of office by the [PVA] at its…”
Bill Dunn, McCracken Cnty. Prop. Valuation Adm'r v. Saratoga, LLC (Ky. Ct. App. 2024).
“The PVA’s duties are set forth in KRS 132.690. KRS 132.690(1)(a) provides that [e]ach parcel of taxable real property or interest therein subject to assessment by the property valuation administrator shall be revalued during each year of each term of office by the [PVA] at its…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 132.690(1)(a) — 3 cases
Bill Dunn, McCracken Cnty. Prop. Valuation Adm'r v. Saratoga, LLC (Ky. Ct. App. 2024).
“The PVA’s duties are set forth in KRS 132.690. KRS 132.690(1)(a) provides that [e]ach parcel of taxable real property or interest therein subject to assessment by the property valuation administrator shall be revalued during each year of each term of office by the [PVA] at its…”
Bill Dunn, McCracken Cnty. Prop. Valuation Adm'r v. Saratoga, LLC (Ky. Ct. App. 2024).
“The PVA’s duties are set forth in KRS 132.690. KRS 132.690(1)(a) provides that [e]ach parcel of taxable real property or interest therein subject to assessment by the property valuation administrator shall be revalued during each year of each term of office by the [PVA] at its…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 132.690(1)(b) — 2 cases
Bill Dunn, McCracken Cnty. Prop. Valuation Adm'r v. Saratoga, LLC (Ky. Ct. App. 2024).
“The PVA’s duties are set forth in KRS 132.690. KRS 132.690(1)(a) provides that [e]ach parcel of taxable real property or interest therein subject to assessment by the property valuation administrator shall be revalued during each year of each term of office by the [PVA] at its…”
Bill Dunn, McCracken Cnty. Prop. Valuation Adm'r v. Saratoga, LLC (Ky. Ct. App. 2024).
“The PVA’s duties are set forth in KRS 132.690. KRS 132.690(1)(a) provides that [e]ach parcel of taxable real property or interest therein subject to assessment by the property valuation administrator shall be revalued during each year of each term of office by the [PVA] at its…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 132.690(3) — 4 cases
Allphin v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 483 (Ky. 1981).
“The Department then ordered the PVAs to raise the submitted assessments under penalty of having their salaries withheld pursuant to KRS 132.690. The dispositive issue becomes whether the Department has the statutory power to reject the tendered assessments.”
Revenue Cabinet Commonwealth v. Est. of Young, 748 S.W.2d 167 (Ky. Ct. App. 1988).
“Allphin, supra at 485 ; KRS 132.690(3); KRS 133.040(1). Therefore, the PVA does not act independently of the Revenue Cabinet, and the cabinet is not bound by his assessments.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.