Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 15.025 (2026)

Conditions to furnishing opinions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Attorney General, when requested in writing, under KRS 15.020, shall furnish such opinions subject to the following conditions: (1) When questions of law of interest to the Commonwealth are submitted by a state department, agency, board or commission; (2) When public questions of law are submitted by either house of the Legislature or by any member of the Legislature; (3) When public questions of law pertaining to local government are submitted in writing by the proper public official of the county or other political subdivision of the Commonwealth; (4) When, in the discretion of the Attorney General, the question presented is of such public interest that an Attorney General's opinion on the subject is deemed desirable and when provided for by regulation pursuant to the provisions of this section. History: Created 1960 Ky. Acts ch. 68, Art. II, sec. 3.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2003–2003 · leading case: Bd. of Trs. v. Attorney Gen. of the Commonwealth, 132 S.W.3d 770 (Ky. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Bd. of Trs. v. Attorney Gen. of the Commonwealth, 132 S.W.3d 770 (Ky. 2003). · cites it 2× “Unable to decipher what effect, if any, HB 389(4) might have on the JFRS, the executive director of the JFRS requested a formal opinion from the Attorney General, pursuant to KRS 15.025(1) as to the bill's proper interpretation and effect with respect to the following potential…”

— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 15.025(1) — 1 case

Bd. of Trs. v. Attorney Gen. of the Commonwealth, 132 S.W.3d 770 (Ky. 2003). “Unable to decipher what effect, if any, HB 389(4) might have on the JFRS, the executive director of the JFRS requested a formal opinion from the Attorney General, pursuant to KRS 15.025(1) as to the bill's proper interpretation and effect with respect to the following potential…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.