From a decision of the fiscal court ordering a new road to be opened, or ordering an
alteration or discontinuance of an existing road, or allowing gates to be erected across a
road or abolishing existing gates, or a decision refusing any such order, the party
aggrieved may bring an action in the Circuit Court of the county where the road is located
to contest the decision of the fiscal court.
Effective: July 13, 2004
History: Amended 2004 Ky. Acts ch. 61, sec. 6, effective July 13, 2004. -- Amended
1978 Ky. Acts ch. 384, sec. 308, effective June 17, 1978. -- Amended 1976 (1st
Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 168, effective January 2, 1978. -- Recodified 1942
Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 4302a-1.
Notes of Decisions
Whitley v. Robertson County (2013)
ky · cites it 18×
“The difference is significant because in the adjudication of an appeal under KRS 178.100 from a fiscal court *13 decision, the circuit court must apply the deferential standard of review explained in Trimble Fiscal Court v.”
Whitley v. Robertson County (2013)
ky · cites it 18×
“The difference is significant because in the adjudication of an appeal under KRS 178.100 from a fiscal court decision, the circuit court must apply the deferential standard of review explained in Trimble Fiscal Court v.”
Trimble Fiscal Court v. Snyder (1993)
kyctapp · cites it 4×
“010 is authorized by KRS 178.100, which provides: From a decision of the fiscal court ordering a new road to be opened, or ordering an alteration or discontinuance of an existing road, or allowing gates to be erected across a road or abolishing existing gates, or a decision…”
Ex Parte Commonwealth (1956)
kyctapphigh
“■On appeal by the property owners to the circuit court, under KRS 178.100, the circuit court entered the judgment here appealed from, dismissing the petition of the department.”
McCowan v. Bond (1952)
kyctapp
“From an adverse judgment there, they could appeal to the circuit court and then to this Court under KRS 178.100. Appellees clearly had an adequate remedy at law, and therefore the injunction should not have been granted.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.