Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 199

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.603

Repealed, 1986

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Involuntary termination of parental rights of a parent of dependent, neglected or abused child. History: Repealed 1986 Ky. Acts ch. 423, sec. 198. -- Created 1978 Ky. Acts ch. 137, sec. 10. Note: This section was repealed by 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 280, which was to have become effective July 1, 1982. Thereafter, 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 284 changed the effective date of that act to July 15, 1984. Then, 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 184 repealed both 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 280, and 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 284.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2024 · leading case: V.S. v. Commonwealth, Cabinet for Human Resources
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
V.S. v. Commonwealth, Cabinet for Human Resources (1986) kyctapp · cites it 9× “The court, if it finds such conditions, may then apply the best interest of the child standard to determine whether to terminate parental rights. Here, the trial court found: (1) that each child was an abused or neglected child; (2) that each of the parents substantially and…”
Wright v. Howard (1986) kyctapp · cites it 9× “In the manner of a “grandfather” clause subsection (4) provides: (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, an adoption may be granted without the consent of the natural living parents of a child if it is pleaded and proved as a part of the adoption…”
Cabinet for Human Resources v. E.S. (1987) ky · cites it 6× “The above quoted "finding of fact" is merely a paraphrase of the involuntary termination statute, KRS 199.603. Such a finding does not comply with the requirements of CR 52.”
B.L. v. J.S. (2014) kyctapp · cites it 3× “was decided pursuant to the old statute for termination of parental rights, KRS 199.603, which was repealed in 1987. The current statute and its corresponding case law contain no requirement that a court consider means less drastic than adoption prior to a judgment of adoption.”
J.H. v. Cabinet for Human Resources (1985) kyctapp · cites it 2× “KRS 199.603 points out: (1) In a proceeding involving a dependent neglected or abused child [abandoned child not mentioned], as defined in KRS 199.”
A.C. v. Cabinet for Health & Family Services (2012) kyctapp “1985) (explaining that KRS 199.603(8) — now KRS 625.080(3)— provides the maximum amount of fees to be awarded to appointed counsel “with no distinction being drawn between trial and appellate advocacy” and “whether the rendered services are provided at trial, or on appeal, or…”
Van Wey v. Van Wey (1983) ky · cites it 2× “601, or the law that relates to involuntary termination, KRS 199.603? The voluntary termination statute provides that "the best interest of the child shall be considered paramount.”
Pillersdorf v. Department of Public Advocacy (1994) ky · cites it 2× “00 statutory fee set by KRS 199.603(8). The attorneys made claims for $1,447.”
Ns v. C and Ms (1983) ky · cites it 3× “" Although not controlling in the present case, the Kentucky General Assembly, in 1978, amended the involuntary termination statute and incorporated a standard of proof requirement therein.”
Department for Human Resources v. Paulson (1981) kyctapp · cites it 2× “KRS 199.603(8). We conclude that this was the proper and appropriate function of the legislature, and that by limiting the fee to this amount, neither appellee will be unconstitutionally deprived of his property or time.”
L.B.A. v. H.A. (1987) kyctapp · cites it 4× “1 In that initial judgment, the court recited that the adoptive parents had “established by a preponderance of the evidence that the [natural mother had] abandoned or neglected her child pursuant to KRS 199.603 § 1.” Subsequently, the judgment was amended to read, by clear and…”
Commonwealth v. Coleman (1985) kyctapp · cites it 9× “The appellee attorneys were, with the exception of appellee/cross-appellant Chimera, appointed by the trial court to act as guardians ad litem in an involuntary-termination of parental rights action, KRS 199.603, instituted by the appellant/cross-appellee Cabinet.”
Show all 25 citing cases →
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.603(1) — 5 cases
Wright v. Howard (1986) kyctapp “In the manner of a “grandfather” clause subsection (4) provides: (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, an adoption may be granted without the consent of the natural living parents of a child if it is pleaded and proved as a part of the adoption…”
Ns v. C and Ms (1983) ky “" Although not controlling in the present case, the Kentucky General Assembly, in 1978, amended the involuntary termination statute and incorporated a standard of proof requirement therein.”
N.S. v. C (1982) ky
L.B.A. v. H.A. (1987) kyctapp “1 In that initial judgment, the court recited that the adoptive parents had “established by a preponderance of the evidence that the [natural mother had] abandoned or neglected her child pursuant to KRS 199.603 § 1.” Subsequently, the judgment was amended to read, by clear and…”
J.E.H. v. Department for Human Resources (1982) kyctapp
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.603(1)(b) — 1 case
Cabinet for Human Resources v. E.S. (1987) ky “The above quoted "finding of fact" is merely a paraphrase of the involuntary termination statute, KRS 199.603. Such a finding does not comply with the requirements of CR 52.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.603(3) — 2 cases
V.S. v. Commonwealth, Cabinet for Human Resources (1986) kyctapp “The court, if it finds such conditions, may then apply the best interest of the child standard to determine whether to terminate parental rights. Here, the trial court found: (1) that each child was an abused or neglected child; (2) that each of the parents substantially and…”
Cabinet for Human Resources v. E.S. (1987) ky “The above quoted "finding of fact" is merely a paraphrase of the involuntary termination statute, KRS 199.603. Such a finding does not comply with the requirements of CR 52.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.603(3)(a) — 1 case
Cabinet for Human Resources v. S.R.J. (1986) kyctapp
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.603(3)(c) — 1 case
V.S. v. Commonwealth, Cabinet for Human Resources (1986) kyctapp “The court, if it finds such conditions, may then apply the best interest of the child standard to determine whether to terminate parental rights. Here, the trial court found: (1) that each child was an abused or neglected child; (2) that each of the parents substantially and…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.603(3)(d) — 2 cases
L.B.A. v. H.A. (1987) kyctapp “1 In that initial judgment, the court recited that the adoptive parents had “established by a preponderance of the evidence that the [natural mother had] abandoned or neglected her child pursuant to KRS 199.603 § 1.” Subsequently, the judgment was amended to read, by clear and…”
Waters v. Cabinet for Human Resources (1987) kyctapp
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.603(4) — 2 cases
Wright v. Howard (1986) kyctapp “In the manner of a “grandfather” clause subsection (4) provides: (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, an adoption may be granted without the consent of the natural living parents of a child if it is pleaded and proved as a part of the adoption…”
G. R. M. v. W. M. S. (1981) kyctapp
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.603(7) — 3 cases
Wright v. Howard (1986) kyctapp “In the manner of a “grandfather” clause subsection (4) provides: (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, an adoption may be granted without the consent of the natural living parents of a child if it is pleaded and proved as a part of the adoption…”
J.H. v. Cabinet for Human Resources (1985) kyctapp “KRS 199.603 points out: (1) In a proceeding involving a dependent neglected or abused child [abandoned child not mentioned], as defined in KRS 199.”
Cabinet for Human Resources v. McKeehan (1984) kyctapp
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.603(8) — 4 cases
A.C. v. Cabinet for Health & Family Services (2012) kyctapp “1985) (explaining that KRS 199.603(8) — now KRS 625.080(3)— provides the maximum amount of fees to be awarded to appointed counsel “with no distinction being drawn between trial and appellate advocacy” and “whether the rendered services are provided at trial, or on appeal, or…”
Pillersdorf v. Department of Public Advocacy (1994) ky “00 statutory fee set by KRS 199.603(8). The attorneys made claims for $1,447.”
Department for Human Resources v. Paulson (1981) kyctapp “KRS 199.603(8). We conclude that this was the proper and appropriate function of the legislature, and that by limiting the fee to this amount, neither appellee will be unconstitutionally deprived of his property or time.”
Commonwealth v. Coleman (1985) kyctapp “The appellee attorneys were, with the exception of appellee/cross-appellant Chimera, appointed by the trial court to act as guardians ad litem in an involuntary-termination of parental rights action, KRS 199.603, instituted by the appellant/cross-appellee Cabinet.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.603(9) — 2 cases
G. R. M. v. W. M. S. (1981) kyctapp
Commonwealth v. Coleman (1985) kyctapp “The appellee attorneys were, with the exception of appellee/cross-appellant Chimera, appointed by the trial court to act as guardians ad litem in an involuntary-termination of parental rights action, KRS 199.603, instituted by the appellant/cross-appellee Cabinet.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.603(l)(a) — 2 cases
V.S. v. Commonwealth, Cabinet for Human Resources (1986) kyctapp “The court, if it finds such conditions, may then apply the best interest of the child standard to determine whether to terminate parental rights. Here, the trial court found: (1) that each child was an abused or neglected child; (2) that each of the parents substantially and…”
Hicks v. Enlow (1989) ky
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.603(l)(b) — 2 cases
Cabinet for Human Resources v. E.S. (1987) ky “The above quoted "finding of fact" is merely a paraphrase of the involuntary termination statute, KRS 199.603. Such a finding does not comply with the requirements of CR 52.”
J.E.H. v. Department for Human Resources (1982) kyctapp
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.