Sanitation districts may be established for any of the following purposes:
(1) To prevent and correct the pollution of streams.
(2) To regulate the flow of streams for sanitary purposes.
(3) To clean and improve stream channels for sanitary purposes.
(4) To provide for the collection and disposal of sewage and other liquid wastes
produced within the district; and incident to those purposes and to enable their
accomplishment, to construct, with all appurtenances, laterals, trunk sewers,
intercepting sewers, siphons, pumping stations, treatment and disposal works, to
maintain, operate, and repair these, and do all other things necessary for the
fulfillment of the purposes of KRS 220.010 to 220.520.
(5) To provide for the management of onsite sewage disposal systems.
(6) To develop and implement plans for the collection and disposal of storm drainage.
Effective: July 15, 1998
History: Amended 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 234, sec. 3, effective July 15, 1998. -- Amended
1994 Ky. Acts ch. 490, sec. 3, effective July 15, 1994. -- Amended 1980 Ky. Acts ch.
149, sec. 2, effective July 15, 1980. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1,
effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 2062g-3.
Notes of Decisions
Coppage Constr. Co. v. Sanitation Dist. No. 1, 459 S.W.3d 855 (Ky. 2015).
· cites it 4× “The appellate court further reasoned that the functions of a sanitation district as outlined in KRS 220.030 (i.e., stream pollution prevention, regulation of stream flow for sanitary purposes, collection and disposal of sewage, and sewage management) constitute matters integral…”
Wessels Co., LLC v. Sanitation Dist. No. 1, 238 S.W.3d 673 (Ky. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 8× “The trial court concluded that the district’s storm water management program falls within the enumeration of functions set out in KRS 220.030 and that *675 authority for the surcharge is found in KRS 220.”
Sanitation Dist. No. 1 of Jefferson Cnty. v. Campbell, 249 S.W.2d 767 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952).
“ase, the legislature defined the purposes and objects of sanitation districts to be in part “to provide for the collection and disposal of sewage and other liquid wastes produced within the district; and incident to such purposes and to enable their accomplishment, to construct…”
Sanitation Dist. No. 1 v. Shelby Cnty., 964 S.W.2d 434 (Ky. Ct. App. 1998).
“020 vests the Secretary of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet (the Cabinet) with the authority “to establish sanitation districts within any county of the Commonwealth,]” so as to address several concerns relating to sewage disposal and water pollution,…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 220.030(4) — 2 cases
Coppage Constr. Co. v. Sanitation Dist. No. 1, 459 S.W.3d 855 (Ky. 2015).
“The appellate court further reasoned that the functions of a sanitation district as outlined in KRS 220.030 (i.e., stream pollution prevention, regulation of stream flow for sanitary purposes, collection and disposal of sewage, and sewage management) constitute matters integral…”
Sanitation Dist. No. 1 of Jefferson Cnty. v. Campbell, 249 S.W.2d 767 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952).
“ase, the legislature defined the purposes and objects of sanitation districts to be in part “to provide for the collection and disposal of sewage and other liquid wastes produced within the district; and incident to such purposes and to enable their accomplishment, to construct…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 220.030(6) — 1 case
Wessels Co., LLC v. Sanitation Dist. No. 1, 238 S.W.3d 673 (Ky. Ct. App. 2007).
“The trial court concluded that the district’s storm water management program falls within the enumeration of functions set out in KRS 220.030 and that *675 authority for the surcharge is found in KRS 220.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 220.030(l) — 1 case
Coppage Constr. Co. v. Sanitation Dist. No. 1, 459 S.W.3d 855 (Ky. 2015).
“The appellate court further reasoned that the functions of a sanitation district as outlined in KRS 220.030 (i.e., stream pollution prevention, regulation of stream flow for sanitary purposes, collection and disposal of sewage, and sewage management) constitute matters integral…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.