Kentucky Revised Statutes
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 241.190 (2026)
Functions of city administrator
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Each city administrator shall have the same duties and functions regarding local license applications and renewals as the department with respect to state licenses. Each city administrator shall have the same duties and functions regarding local license penalization as the board with respect to state license penalization. Effective:June 29, 2017 History: Amended 2017 Ky. Acts ch. 62, sec. 14, effective June 29, 2017. -- Amended 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 522, sec. 3, effective July 15, 1998. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 2554b-111.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1947–2021 · leading case: City of Bowling Green v. Gasoline Marketers, Inc., 539 S.W.2d 281 (Ky. 1976).
City of Bowling Green v. Gasoline Marketers, Inc., 539 S.W.2d 281 (Ky. 1976). “As to the latter attack, appellees argue that KRS 241.190 supports their position. The City of Bowling Green has, pursuant to the authority of KRS 241.”
O'Brien v. Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 206 S.W.2d 941 (Ky. Ct. App. 1947). “KRS 241.190 sets out the functions of city administrators which shall be the same with respect to city licenses and regulations as the function of the Board with re *242 spect to state licenses and regulations, with the exception that city administrators’ regulations shall not…”
City of Louisville v. Michael A. Woods, Inc., 883 S.W.2d 881 (Ky. Ct. App. 1993). “KRS 241.190 further provides that the functions of a city administrator shall be the same with respect to city licenses and regulations as the functions of the board with respect to state licenses and regulations.”
Beverage Warehouse, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 382 S.W.3d 34 (Ky. Ct. App. 2011). “KRS 241.190. The statutes further provide that an application for a city license to sell alcoholic beverages first be approved by the city administrator, who must refuse the license if the “applicant or the premises for which the license is sought does not comply with all…”
City of Newport v. Tye, 335 S.W.2d 340 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960). “160 authorizes a city to create the office of City Alcoholic Beverage Control Administrator and KRS 241.190 provides that no regulation of the' administrator shall become effective until approved by the State Board.”
City of Ashland v. Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 982 S.W.2d 210 (Ky. Ct. App. 1998). “070; provided that any rule or regulation adopted in the regulatory ordinance shall conform to the requirements of KRS 241.190. In February 1996, the appellee, Ashland, Inc.”
Jim King v. Beverage Warehouse, LLC (Ky. Ct. App. 2021). “KRS 241.190 provided that no regulation adopted by the city administrator could be less stringent than the state statutes relating to alcoholic beverage control or the ABC Board’s regulations.”
City of Richmond v. Collins, 221 S.W.2d 625 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949). “KRS 241.190. Briefly the sum and substance of the petition, which in form met all statutory technical requirements authorizing injunctive relief, was that the action of the legislative body was discriminatory, arbitrary, not within the police power of the city, and was an…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.