(1) KRS 273.161 to 273.390, so far as it can be made applicable, shall apply to any
nonstock, nonprofit corporation in existence on June 30, 1968, which was formed
under the general laws of this state relating to religious, educational, charitable,
civic, athletic, recreational, and social nonstock, nonprofit corporations, or by
special act, for a purpose or purposes for which a corporation might be formed
under KRS 273.161 to 273.390.
(2) It shall not be necessary for any such existing corporation to amend its articles to set
forth the provisions required by KRS 273.161 to 273.390 to be set forth in articles
of incorporation.
(3) Such existing corporations shall have all the powers enumerated in KRS 273.171.
History: Created 1968 Ky. Acts ch. 165, sec. 71.
Notes of Decisions
Univ. of Louisville v. Martin, 574 S.W.2d 676 (Ky. Ct. App. 1978).
“” This provision would have been applicable even though the university had not amended its Articles of Incorporation since KRS 273.387(3) dictates that any “. . . nonstock, nonprofit corporation in existence on June 30,1968 .”
Rooks v. Univ. of Louisville, 574 S.W.2d 923 (Ky. Ct. App. 1978).
“” KRS 273.387(1), regardless of amendment. To argue that such language allows suit against the University of Louisville is, however, to contradict several previous court holdings explicitly denying such an interpretation.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 273.387(1) — 1 case
Rooks v. Univ. of Louisville, 574 S.W.2d 923 (Ky. Ct. App. 1978).
“” KRS 273.387(1), regardless of amendment. To argue that such language allows suit against the University of Louisville is, however, to contradict several previous court holdings explicitly denying such an interpretation.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 273.387(3) — 1 case
Univ. of Louisville v. Martin, 574 S.W.2d 676 (Ky. Ct. App. 1978).
“” This provision would have been applicable even though the university had not amended its Articles of Incorporation since KRS 273.387(3) dictates that any “. . . nonstock, nonprofit corporation in existence on June 30,1968 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.