Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 281
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.460 (2026)

Repealed, 1950

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Financial responsibility of operators of taxicabs and city busses. History: Repealed 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 63, sec. 57, effective June 15, 1950. -- Amended 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 185, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 2739L-11.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1947–1953 · leading case: Maryland Cas. Co. v. Baker, 200 S.W.2d 757 (Ky. Ct. App. 1947).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Maryland Cas. Co. v. Baker, 200 S.W.2d 757 (Ky. Ct. App. 1947). · cites it 2× “The determination of this question requires a construction of KRS 281.460 which is, in part, as follows: “ (1) Before any authorization for the operation of a taxicab or city bus is granted by the division under KRS 281.”
Underwriters for Lloyds of London v. Jones, 261 S.W.2d 686 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). · cites it 3× “The principal questions for decision are whether a taxicab indemnity insurance policy issued pursuant to KRS 281.460 limits the liability of the insurer to : (1) $5,000 for any one accident or (2) $5,000 to each person injured or killed in any one accident.”
Adams v. Burke, 215 S.W.2d 531 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948). · cites it 4× “Under section 281.460 the applicant must file with the Director of the Division an indemnity bond or policy of insurance covering public liability for personal injuries or property damage.”
City of Louisville v. Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co., 238 S.W.2d 121 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951). “” KRS 281.460 provides for certain qualifying steps to be taken “Before any authorization for the operation of a taxicab or city bus is granted by the division under KRS 281.”
Preferred Acc. Ins. v. Noe, 234 S.W.2d 748 (Ky. Ct. App. 1950). “Appellant had issued its policy of insurance to Veach which was accepted by the Division of Motor Transportation and on file there for the purpose of meeting requirements of KRS 281.460. The facts as to the contractual relationship of the insured, Veach, and appellee were…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.