Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 281
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.625 (2026)

Repealed, 2015

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Hearing on application -- Notice -- Protest -- Exceptions. History: Repealed 2015 Ky. Acts ch. 19, sec. 45, effective June 24, 2015. -- Amended 2014 Ky. Acts ch. 21, sec. 2, effective July 15, 2014. -- Amended 2012 Ky. Acts ch. 139, sec. 3, effective July 12, 2012. -- Amended 2005 Ky. Acts ch. 85, sec. 673, effective June 20, 2005. -- Amended 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 174, sec. 6, effective July 15, 1996; and ch. 318, sec. 194, effective July 15, 1996. -- Amended 1978 Ky. Acts ch. 232, sec. 7, effective June 17, 1978. -- Amended 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 74, Art. IV, sec. 20(2). -- Amended 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 255, sec. 228. -- Amended 1964 Ky. Acts ch. 95, sec. 10. -- Amended 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 130, sec. 9. -- Amended 1954 Ky. Acts ch. 188, sec. 4. -- Created 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 63, sec. 12, effective June 15, 1950.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1952–2014 · leading case: Bruner v. Zawacki, 997 F. Supp. 2d 691 (E.D. Ky. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bruner v. Zawacki, 997 F. Supp. 2d 691 (E.D. Ky. 2014). · cites it 14× “KRS § 281.625. But the second requirement — -which effectively requires competitors to approve a new company— undermines the stated goal.”
Shockey Tours, Inc. v. Miller Transp., Inc., 984 S.W.2d 95 (Ky. 1998). “KRS 281.625(l)(b) confers standing upon “every authorized carrier, including railroads, serving any part of the route proposed to be served or abandoned by the applicant.”
Express v. Combs Motor Freight, Inc., 372 S.W.2d 807 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963). “The statute, KRS 281.625, provides that notice of an application may be given by D.”
Dep't of Motor Transp. of Kentucky v. Eck Miller Transfer Co., 249 S.W.2d 802 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952). “At least thirty days before the hearing, the department shall mail written notice of the hearing, and of the right to file a protest, in accordance with the requirements of the department, to the applicant and every authorized carrier, including railroads, serving any part of…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.625(1) — 1 case
Bruner v. Zawacki, 997 F. Supp. 2d 691 (E.D. Ky. 2014). “KRS § 281.625. But the second requirement — -which effectively requires competitors to approve a new company— undermines the stated goal.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.625(2) — 1 case
Bruner v. Zawacki, 997 F. Supp. 2d 691 (E.D. Ky. 2014). “KRS § 281.625. But the second requirement — -which effectively requires competitors to approve a new company— undermines the stated goal.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.625(b) — 1 case
Bruner v. Zawacki, 997 F. Supp. 2d 691 (E.D. Ky. 2014). “KRS § 281.625. But the second requirement — -which effectively requires competitors to approve a new company— undermines the stated goal.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.625(l)(b) — 1 case
Shockey Tours, Inc. v. Miller Transp., Inc., 984 S.W.2d 95 (Ky. 1998). “KRS 281.625(l)(b) confers standing upon “every authorized carrier, including railroads, serving any part of the route proposed to be served or abandoned by the applicant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.